Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't think our coaching staff wants him.
Figure most of the kids at Ole Mi$$ will be looking for better deals than USC is offering
Why wouldn't you want DeMarcus Gregory? Muschamp is a great recruiter and I trust his judgment on defensive players just about to the same extent I doubt his judgment on offensive ones.
They have guys higher on the board.
They have guys higher on the board.
Maybe someone on here knows the answer to this question. If the 2017 recruits have not yet enrolled are they free to transfer without having to sit out one year ?
You guys have to let this goFigure most of the kids at Ole Mi$$ will be looking for better deals than USC is offering
I would trust Muschamp's opinion on defensive players, but not offensive. Particularly on ignoring a Rival's 4-star, it is hard to believe he has a bunch of WR recruits higher on the board that are seriously considering SC. Maybe this recruit is off the board entirely if he is asking for money or has character concerns. But I doubt there are a bunch of guys more physically talented that are higher on the board. If so, his spotty record on offensive recruits is showing.
We are suppose to bring in 3 WR's this year
Darius Rush, 6-2 172, a lifelong Gamecock fan and high jump champion and intriguing prospect given the leaping ability. Our first commitment for this class.
Josh Vann is down to Georgia and SC and much higher rated then Gregory on the recruiting services, top 20 WR vs Gregory at 76
Matt Hill is higher rated but probably will be Auburn
If South Carolina accepts the commitment from Tyquan Johnson at the cookout this weekend that will be slot # 2 taken. I would think no room for Gregory, Tyquan has shined at camp same size as Gregory, 6-3 195 and this is important, he wants to be a Gamecock. He is not as highly ranked as Gregory 40 slots lower in WR rankings but his camp was outstanding and that is important to this staff, in person evaluations. His film shows a pretty fluid smooth WR.
Why wouldn't you want DeMarcus Gregory? Muschamp is a great recruiter and I trust his judgment on defensive players just about to the same extent I doubt his judgment on offensive ones.
We keep saying Muschamp is a great recruiter and great defensive coach but ......... honestly our defense hasn't gotten better under his watch And we are fighting it out for 3 stars. Just being real.
He hasn't been here for two seasons yet for crying out loud what are you talking about? He had either the youngest or second youngest team in the Country last year on what grounds are you judging. What did you expect? Ridiculous.We keep saying Muschamp is a great recruiter and great defensive coach but ......... honestly our defense hasn't gotten better under his watch And we are fighting it out for 3 stars. Just being real.
Rivals has Josh Vann the number 45 WR and Demarcus Gregory the No. 60 WR. Not sure where you are getting top 20 and #76 from. SC is likely not getting the Tucker, Georgia WR Vann anyway. Georgia is far more likely. In the big picture, your whole commitment list at all positions has two 4-star recruits. I can't see not having room for a 4-star WR like Gregory. The only reason would not be a talent reason but some other concern. If it is talent evaluation, I call it suspect. Rivals has neither Rush nor Johnson among the top 100 WRs.
Go after the present players too they could be looking.
He has been here 1 year. We have won 9 games in the last 2 years.We keep saying Muschamp is a great recruiter and great defensive coach but ......... honestly our defense hasn't gotten better under his watch And we are fighting it out for 3 stars. Just being real.
I call your understanding of football talent evaluation suspect! You are valuing a recruiting website's ranking of Hs talent- opinions from a bunch of journalism nerds making barely enough to pay for their $900 a month rent payments- over guys who have been hired by massive state run institutions and paid MILLIONS of dollars a year to evaluate and coach talent... that is ass backwards. Rivals employees and sites like them do not have the experience, football backgrounds, nor the hands on evaluation time that coaches DO have. Stars mean nothin at all in the comtext you are referencing them "this guy is a 4* rated #10 and his position and the other guy is a 3* rated #12 at the same position by rivals, so obviously the 4* guy is better"- BUUUULLLLLSHIT. THERE IS NO MEASURABLE ON PAPER DIFFERENCE BETWEEN PLAYERS LIKE THAT. Even the Rivals rating is typically within one or two bips... IOW they dont fn know! Coaches are evaluating for more than which kid is the best athlete, they are evaluating character, looking for certain typeS of athletes that fit their schemes, leaders... Rivals is looking at a 40 time some half retarded Hs coach timed with a stop watch looking at kids running across lines drawn in the dirt... You just need to stop man, you are making yourself look like a fool.Rivals has Josh Vann the number 45 WR and Demarcus Gregory the No. 60 WR. Not sure where you are getting top 20 and #76 from. SC is likely not getting the Tucker, Georgia WR Vann anyway. Georgia is far more likely. In the big picture, your whole commitment list at all positions has two 4-star recruits. I can't see not having room for a 4-star WR like Gregory. The only reason would not be a talent reason but some other concern. If it is talent evaluation, I call it suspect. Rivals has neither Rush nor Johnson among the top 100 WRs.
I call your understanding of football talent evaluation suspect! You are valuing a recruiting website's ranking of Hs talent- opinions from a bunch of journalism nerds making barely enough to pay for their $900 a month rent payments- over guys who have been hired by massive state run institutions and paid MILLIONS of dollars a year to evaluate and coach talent... that is ass backwards. Rivals employees and sites like them do not have the experience, football backgrounds, nor the hands on evaluation time that coaches DO have. Stars mean nothin at all in the comtext you are referencing them "this guy is a 4* rated #10 and his position and the other guy is a 3* rated #12 at the same position by rivals, so obviously the 4* guy is better"- BUUUULLLLLSHIT. THERE IS NO MEASURABLE ON PAPER DIFFERENCE BETWEEN PLAYERS LIKE THAT. Even the Rivals rating is typically within one or two bips... IOW they dont fn know! Coaches are evaluating for more than which kid is the best athlete, they are evaluating character, looking for certain typeS of athletes that fit their schemes, leaders... Rivals is looking at a 40 time some half retarded Hs coach timed with a stop watch looking at kids running across lines drawn in the dirt... You just need to stop man, you are making yourself look like a fool.
Espn has Vann has top 300, # 222, Gregory is not in top 300
247 now has Vann as # 36, Gegory is #76, at one point they had Vann at #20 on overall WR list i was perusing yesterday, but looks like his slid some.
I dont think Rivals is most accurate in ranking these guys but they have a great Gamecock message board!
For Vann per Kornblut on 7/20,
I think it’s kind of like 50-50 now,” Vann said. “It was back and forth. It was with Georgia, then South Carolina, then Georgia and then South Carolina. I’ve been to both schools the same amount of time. This will be my third time down to South Carolina and last weekend that was my third time down there (Georgia). Everything is kind of like 50-50 at this point. It will be tough to choose one.”
Maybe Georgia is a slight favorite since he is from there but he is in Columbia this weekend.
But again Gregory isnt at Camp, isnt in town, and still commited to Ole Miss, and Ronnie Jamison a unranked Juco WR who played QB at Irmo is and blew up at the camp and got a offer and probably commits Sunday it would seem. This staff loves former HS QB's that are getting positional changes, but maybe the staff sees another position?
So thats a player much lower ranked then Gregory that we will be taking, it seems
I call your understanding of football talent evaluation suspect! You are valuing a recruiting website's ranking of Hs talent- opinions from a bunch of journalism nerds making barely enough to pay for their $900 a month rent payments- over guys who have been hired by massive state run institutions and paid MILLIONS of dollars a year to evaluate and coach talent... that is ass backwards. Rivals employees and sites like them do not have the experience, football backgrounds, nor the hands on evaluation time that coaches DO have. Stars mean nothin at all in the comtext you are referencing them "this guy is a 4* rated #10 and his position and the other guy is a 3* rated #12 at the same position by rivals, so obviously the 4* guy is better"- BUUUULLLLLSHIT. THERE IS NO MEASURABLE ON PAPER DIFFERENCE BETWEEN PLAYERS LIKE THAT. Even the Rivals rating is typically within one or two bips... IOW they dont fn know! Coaches are evaluating for more than which kid is the best athlete, they are evaluating character, looking for certain typeS of athletes that fit their schemes, leaders... Rivals is looking at a 40 time some half retarded Hs coach timed with a stop watch looking at kids running across lines drawn in the dirt... You just need to stop man, you are making yourself look like a fool.
These star rankings are like election polls they are wrong as many times as they are right. If a kid is obviously a man among boys like Clowney was he rates a 5* outside of that it's just a guess as to how good he can be. Coaches don't look at the kid like the so called ratings people do they also look at 2 or 3 years down the road. Grades, work habits, can he be coached, character is what's huge. Who needs a 4* or 5* rating if you can't qualify or if you're trouble?
I agreeThat was my point. Perhaps there is a character issue or a wanting $$$ remuneration issue from the player that would drop him off Muschamp's recruiting lists, but it isn't a football talent reason and some above were suggesting it was.
If you don't like any recruiting sites's rankings, just look at the offer lists then. Look at their best 7 or 8 offers.
For Tyquan Johnson it is Kansas State, Georgia State, Kentucky, Mississippi state, West Virginia, Cincinnati and I guess who for a 7th? Troy?
For Darius Rush it is: Old Dominion, South Carolina State, Charlotte and Miami of Ohio. That's it.
For Gregory it is: Auburn, Florida, Nebraska, Tennessee, North Carolina, Arkansas, Louisville and you could go on with several more decent teams.
I don't think you really need recruiting rankings, just look at offer lists.
I agree offer lists count, the problem is figuring out what is commit able offers and what is not and that is not readily available.
There is a WR last year Austin Connor who rivals says had offers from ECU, South Carolina, Tennessee, Vanderbilt, Virgina Tech. There was also a reported Georgia offer, and he is a walk on at South Carolina this fall.
Is Gregory higher ranked then Rush, absolutely, better offer offer list, absolutely, will he be a better player, i dont know, would the staff rescind his offer if Gregory who picked another school wanted to come, absolutely not.
This staff has a good track record on WR recruits so far, i don't care what happened at Florida since you have new staff members involved, diff WR coach etc.
I think we have higher ranked prospects on our board such as Vann and if Gregory ever decommits we will be full by then.
Figure most of the kids at Ole Mi$$ will be looking for better deals than USC is offering
I would trust Muschamp's opinion on defensive players, but not offensive. Particularly on ignoring a Rival's 4-star, it is hard to believe he has a bunch of WR recruits higher on the board that are seriously considering SC. Maybe this recruit is off the board entirely if he is asking for money or has character concerns. But I doubt there are a bunch of guys more physically talented that are higher on the board. If so, his spotty record on offensive recruits is showing.
Wrong. Don't go by his Fla days or Texas days. Our WR and RB recruits have been best of all positions. Lot of that is Bentley and BMac but Muschamp involved.
Add Edwards and 2 Smiths at WR. ... What position has been recruited better than WR and RB since he showed up ?
Trusting him when he takes a 3-star and turns down a 4-star at the same position.