I’m giving Muschamp credit for being a “winner” in two years where one was at UF and he had an offense that was awful but he still had double digit wins and one where he won 8 games at SC in what was likely the weakest schedule we’ve ever had in SEC play and did it with an awful offense and middling defense.
The main point of the question is....don’t HC’s who turn out to be good show a winning trend/upward momentum by year 3, or sooner?
For those of us hoping that Muschamp becomes a consistent winner here, aren’t we really hoping for Muschamp to become something that 8 years of data shows he’s not, and something that statistics across college football show is unlikely to happen?
The main point of the question is....don’t HC’s who turn out to be good show a winning trend/upward momentum by year 3, or sooner?
For those of us hoping that Muschamp becomes a consistent winner here, aren’t we really hoping for Muschamp to become something that 8 years of data shows he’s not, and something that statistics across college football show is unlikely to happen?