You might be right, but 9:00 is still pretty late to announce.Originally posted by sanfordcock:
From what I read he's LSU bound. Tough to lose someone we've been on for 3+ years and LSU swoops in and gets him. I think he announces at 10:00 because Lousiana is not on Eastern Time Zone.
Really? An overall better program steals a big time recruit from our program and they're cheating? I'm tired of the excuses.Originally posted by rockingamecock:
nm
So he decommitted because he is afraid we were going to hire Ward so he is going to go play for Muschamp?Originally posted by coastguardcock:
Still think he goes to Auburn. I wouldn't be surprised to see Auburn land a few surprises on the defensive side. That is what happens when you land a proven Defensive Coordinator like Muschamp. You may lose a few recruits to previous talks/promises, but you may land a few studs just as well. Bottom line, you bring in a proven leader on the defensive side who is an immediate upgrade regardless of recruits decisions.
From what I read, Muschamp will be our DC in 2015 season.Originally posted by sanfordcock:
From what I read he's LSU bound. Tough to lose someone we've been on for 3+ years and LSU swoops in and gets him. I think he announces at 10:00 because Lousiana is not on Eastern Time Zone.
Ward is on staff, so I don't understand the "hiring Ward" part of your question. Who knows why he decommitted........twice? I am saying that Auburn has a tremendous offense, and with Muschamp, will be better on defense. They are a championship contender next year. With two 5 star Clemson commits making surprise visits to Auburn this past weekend, I wouldn't be surprised if they decommitted from Clemson.Originally posted by ReadR00ster:
So he decommitted because he is afraid we were going to hire Ward so he is going to go play for Muschamp?Originally posted by coastguardcock:
Still think he goes to Auburn. I wouldn't be surprised to see Auburn land a few surprises on the defensive side. That is what happens when you land a proven Defensive Coordinator like Muschamp. You may lose a few recruits to previous talks/promises, but you may land a few studs just as well. Bottom line, you bring in a proven leader on the defensive side who is an immediate upgrade regardless of recruits decisions.
I hope they DO decommit. It would make for a fun afternoon to witness the major meltdown on TaterNet.Originally posted by coastguardcock:
Ward is on staff, so I don't understand the "hiring Ward" part of your question. Who knows why he decommitted........twice? I am saying that Auburn has a tremendous offense, and with Muschamp, will be better on defense. They are a championship contender next year. With two 5 star Clemson commits making surprise visits to Auburn this past weekend, I wouldn't be surprised if they decommitted from Clemson.Originally posted by ReadR00ster:
So he decommitted because he is afraid we were going to hire Ward so he is going to go play for Muschamp?Originally posted by coastguardcock:
Still think he goes to Auburn. I wouldn't be surprised to see Auburn land a few surprises on the defensive side. That is what happens when you land a proven Defensive Coordinator like Muschamp. You may lose a few recruits to previous talks/promises, but you may land a few studs just as well. Bottom line, you bring in a proven leader on the defensive side who is an immediate upgrade regardless of recruits decisions.
This post was edited on 2/2 11:33 AM by coastguardcock
Easy there TPB. Those types of character kids are my preference, not everyone has to agree. Had we continued to build upon the successes of those type players, we very well might be in the national picture right now. Instead, the coaches lapsed into a permanent vacation and here we sit trying to salvage a recruiting class which, by ranking, isn't any better than those since 2012.Originally posted by TrailerParkBoy:
Im getting sick of the "we don't need these look at me types" when these "look at me" types are committing to these schools that have won national titles with these "look at me types". Remember Lattimore, Ingram, Gilmore etc.... never won a national title.
oops typo, I meant fire Ward.Originally posted by coastguardcock:
Ward is on staff, so I don't understand the "hiring Ward" part of your question. Who knows why he decommitted........twice? I am saying that Auburn has a tremendous offense, and with Muschamp, will be better on defense. They are a championship contender next year. With two 5 star Clemson commits making surprise visits to Auburn this past weekend, I wouldn't be surprised if they decommitted from Clemson.Originally posted by ReadR00ster:
So he decommitted because he is afraid we were going to hire Ward so he is going to go play for Muschamp?Originally posted by coastguardcock:
Still think he goes to Auburn. I wouldn't be surprised to see Auburn land a few surprises on the defensive side. That is what happens when you land a proven Defensive Coordinator like Muschamp. You may lose a few recruits to previous talks/promises, but you may land a few studs just as well. Bottom line, you bring in a proven leader on the defensive side who is an immediate upgrade regardless of recruits decisions.
This post was edited on 2/2 11:33 AM by coastguardcock
He's not a 5 star recruit. I don't even think he's a top 100 recruit, but you sure wouldn't know it with all of the drama surrounding him.Originally posted by section907:
5* recruits do not commit at 10 pm on Monday nights.js.... Even 90 - 95% of the college fans that follow recruiting will be reading about where Key commits to "again" tomorrow morning in the news papers and even then it is not guarantee until he sends in his paper work.. I would say with his recruiting track record there would still be a good chance for another team to flip his commitment before he sends in his signed letter.. jmo
Actually he is a Top 100 recruit. And the reason he's doing it at 10 pm tonight is because he's doing it on a recruiting show on Fox Sports.Originally posted by Cackdiesel:
He's not a 5 star recruit. I don't even think he's a top 100 recruit, but you sure wouldn't know it with all of the drama surrounding him.Originally posted by section907:
5* recruits do not commit at 10 pm on Monday nights.js.... Even 90 - 95% of the college fans that follow recruiting will be reading about where Key commits to "again" tomorrow morning in the news papers and even then it is not guarantee until he sends in his paper work.. I would say with his recruiting track record there would still be a good chance for another team to flip his commitment before he sends in his signed letter.. jmo
I just checked the list and I didn't see him. I could have missed him though. He's definitley not #85 though. I'm sure he's good and he's got a great offer list. But just seems like a lot of drama over one guy.Originally posted by coastguardcock:
I think he is #85 overall recruit.
He may be a top 100 recruit according to you, but he's not listed as one on rivals. He's ranked at #247. But forget about rivals, I guess we'll just have to trust your analysis all mighty one. You should probably take your own advice. Get a clue.Originally posted by GamecockWarrior:
Actually he is a Top 100 recruit. And the reason he's doing it at 10 pm tonight is because he's doing it on a recruiting show on Fox Sports.Originally posted by Cackdiesel:
He's not a 5 star recruit. I don't even think he's a top 100 recruit, but you sure wouldn't know it with all of the drama surrounding him.Originally posted by section907:
5* recruits do not commit at 10 pm on Monday nights.js.... Even 90 - 95% of the college fans that follow recruiting will be reading about where Key commits to "again" tomorrow morning in the news papers and even then it is not guarantee until he sends in his paper work.. I would say with his recruiting track record there would still be a good chance for another team to flip his commitment before he sends in his signed letter.. jmo
Geez...wish some of you guys would actually get a clue in regards to what you're posting about before making posts. Too many folks post on topics they have no idea about.
I remember the Lattimore recruitment better that you do. He pulled the hat trick on us, so don't tell me he wasn't a "look at me" guy. Just let the recruits have their fun and stop being so uptight about it.Originally posted by G-C-Gamecock:
Easy there TPB. Those types of character kids are my preference, not everyone has to agree. Had we continued to build upon the successes of those type players, we very well might be in the national picture right now. Instead, the coaches lapsed into a permanent vacation and here we sit trying to salvage a recruiting class which, by ranking, isn't any better than those since 2012.Originally posted by TrailerParkBoy:
Im getting sick of the "we don't need these look at me types" when these "look at me" types are committing to these schools that have won national titles with these "look at me types". Remember Lattimore, Ingram, Gilmore etc.... never won a national title.
Yes, sir. Anything you say because you run zhit. Takes someone special to compare the recruitment and antics of Lattimore to those of Key and then to claim they know Lattimore to be a "look at me" type of individual.Originally posted by ReadR00ster:
I remember the Lattimore recruitment better that you do. He pulled the hat trick on us, so don't tell me he wasn't a "look at me" guy. Just let the recruits have their fun and stop being so uptight about it.Originally posted by G-C-Gamecock:
Easy there TPB. Those types of character kids are my preference, not everyone has to agree. Had we continued to build upon the successes of those type players, we very well might be in the national picture right now. Instead, the coaches lapsed into a permanent vacation and here we sit trying to salvage a recruiting class which, by ranking, isn't any better than those since 2012.Originally posted by TrailerParkBoy:
Im getting sick of the "we don't need these look at me types" when these "look at me" types are committing to these schools that have won national titles with these "look at me types". Remember Lattimore, Ingram, Gilmore etc.... never won a national title.
All depends on what recruit ranking you are looking at. Rivals has him 247, I saw where he was 84 or 89 on another site. This one has him 24. Who knows?He may be a top 100 recruit according to you, but he's not listed as one on rivals. He's ranked at #247. But forget about rivals, I guess we'll just have to trust your analysis all mighty one. You should probably take your own advice. Get a clue.Actually he is a Top 100 recruit. And the reason he's doing it at 10 pm tonight is because he's doing it on a recruiting show on Fox Sports.
Geez...wish some of you guys would actually get a clue in regards to what you're posting about before making posts. Too many folks post on topics they have no idea about.
This post was edited on 2/2 3:02 PM by Cackdiesel
This post was edited on 2/2 3:03 PM by Cackdiesel