I can't make up my mind if I want him re-instated or not. And I know my opinion does not matter. LOL! But, to be honest I don't know what is fair in this case. He did deny for many years that he didn't bet on baseball. So, the cover up is worst than the actual crime in some cases. Just sayin.............Originally posted by CockofEarle:
maybe the 3rd time is the charm?
How do we know that Rose only bet on the Reds to win? Is it his word only, or is there documentation to support his claim? If there is no verification he only bet on wins, I can't go along with voting him back into baseball and hence the Hall.Originally posted by treetop flier:
Pete has admitted that he bet on games he managed.But always to win.
I think bookies have confirmed this. If fact I remember a story where the bookie used this info, when Rose did not bet on the Reds, he would bet against the Reds.Originally posted by Freddie.B.Cocky:
How do we know that Rose only bet on the Reds to win? Is it his word only, or is there documentation to support his claim? If there is no verification he only bet on wins, I can't go along with voting him back into baseball and hence the Hall.Originally posted by treetop flier:
Pete has admitted that he bet on games he managed.But always to win.
Absolutely not. Getting Joe in the hall should be priority one.Originally posted by PerchedOnRings:
Can you let him in without Shoeless Joe?
Ok he is banned, can't play or manage again. What has that got to do with his play on the field. Let him in.Originally posted by bravecock:
Every year in spring training, each team has a compliance day. In that meeting, every eligible must attend. They read the rules. When they read Rule 21, the compliance officer states the punishment is an automatic ban for life. Its the only such rule in baseball. To fulfill the eligibility requirement, each player must sign the document, indicating they willingly accept its punishment.
Originally posted by treetop flier:
Pete has admitted that he bet on games he managed.But always to win.
So if he had $$ on a game for the Reds to win, would he burn through this bullpen to make that happen and just not bet on the next game?
But none of those are baseball players. As someone awhile back stated, baseball holds to it's traditions and rules much more than the other professional sports.Originally posted by uscgrad1991:
I know of 5 people who playing professional sports who have been convicted of killing someone. You also have oj who is in the nfl hall of fame. For crying out loud let Pete Rose in
This post was edited on 3/17 5:24 PM by uscgrad1991
I agree that betting on baseball, as far as society at large is concerned, is a minor offense compared to what many athletes get away with. But as far as baseball itself is concerned, gambling on the game by players and managers more directly effects the integrity of the game, and by extension, the game's survival as a sport, than any other offense. MLB isn't saying Pete Rose is worse than OJ Simpson or Ray Rice. But they are saying that gambling on the game while involved with the game can potentially lead to MLB's downfall since it directly effects fans' trust in the game. As bad as steroids users and cheaters are, at least fans know those guys are trying to win.Originally posted by uscgrad1991:
I know of 5 people who playing professional sports who have been convicted of killing someone. You also have oj who is in the nfl hall of fame. For crying out loud let Pete Rose in
This post was edited on 3/17 5:24 PM by uscgrad1991
But, was OJ already in the football HOF before he committed those crimes? I don't know what the policy is for committing such crimes after a player has been inducted into the HOF. For my money, it would be great if OJ was thrown out of the HOF.Originally posted by uscgrad1991:
Yea teach Pete a lesson. Good thing OJ didn't mess up like Pete did. He wouldn't have gotten in the NFL hall of fame.