ADVERTISEMENT

Have we thought about using Hurst in the wildcat?

gamecockfan04

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2003
5,340
3,004
113
I mean he's a beast to tackle and has a cannon for an arm, so he wouldn't be just limited to a run threat.
Just a thought.
 
I have. I brought it up a couple of weeks ago. But I'm not the one who counts.

The wildcat only makes sense in short yardage and goal line, and Hurst is the natural choice, IMO. With a long field, we're better having the ball in Jake's hands because safeties will be back in coverage out of respect for his arm.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vacock#
I have. I brought it up a couple of weeks ago. But I'm not the one who counts.

The wildcat only makes sense in short yardage and goal line, and Hurst is the natural choice, IMO. With a long field, we're better having the ball in Jake's hands because safeties will be back in coverage out of respect for his arm.

It also makes sense to mix up our plays, keep a drive going.
 
I mean he's a beast to tackle and has a cannon for an arm, so he wouldn't be just limited to a run threat.
Just a thought.
I said that when we couldn't get a foot on the goal line against Kensucky. There's no damn way
they would stop him in the wildcat on the goal line!
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT