The democrats talk about free housing, free healthcare, free food. You know how theyll pay for that? Slavery.So you’re saying he wouldn’t be a modern day Republican? Gotcha.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The democrats talk about free housing, free healthcare, free food. You know how theyll pay for that? Slavery.So you’re saying he wouldn’t be a modern day Republican? Gotcha.
The democrats talk about free housing, free healthcare, free food. You know how theyll pay for that? Slavery.
No, I’m saying modern day Democrats still believe in slavery, they just disguise it as welfare.So you’re saying he wouldn’t be a modern day Republican? Gotcha.
Think about it brother. Huge taxes so the government gets more, you get the healthcare they tell you to get, uniform housing in the name of fairness, food choices limited, meanwhile removing your means of self-defense. They've already brought back segregation. You're a sheep dude. You're fake woke. Live free or die.Wow.
Actually, no traitors.No, it was Democrat traitors.
No, I’m saying modern day Democrats still believe in slavery, they just disguise it as welfare.
And dead on the money.what a well thought out and informative post.
Chase deemed secession constitutional, not the reverse. The states retained all rights unto themselves, except for federal exceptions spelled out and reserved unto the federal government. Sucession was not mentioned or prohibited. In fact the Commonwealths of Virginia and Kentucky expressly reserved the right to seceed, originally (they voted not to seceed until the feds refused to acknowledge their right, then they did). Texas also retained their right to seceed when they originally joined the union.Chase, essentially, deemed secession unconstitutional. He was wrong, of course, but it is what it is.
Chase deemed secession constitutional, not the reverse. The states retained all rights unto themselves, except for federal exceptions spelled out and reserved unto the federal government. Sucession was not mentioned or prohibited. In fact the Commonwealths of Virginia and Kentucky expressly reserved the right to seceed, originally (they voted not to seceed until the feds refused to acknowledge their right, then they did). Texas also retained their right to seceed when they originally joined the union.
And dead on the money.
The fact you believe that explains why so many of your other posts are nonsensical.
lay off the conspiracy theories.
Rollerdude, you are still rolling. Could you describe your long term vision for the world?The fact you believe that explains why so many of your other posts are nonsensical.
lay off the conspiracy theories.
Rollerdude, you are still rolling. Could you describe your long term vision for the world?
That seriously makes me wonder what sort of people you know, Watson. I mean, I already know what it’s like to fire an M60, or a LAW, or fire off a claymore, or throw a grenade. Been there, done that. Be darned if I know why anyone would seriously want to own any of the above; what are you going to do with it, just look at it? If you took a full auto to a range, you’re gonna burn through a lot of ammo in a short period of time; I use up enough just staying somewhat proficient with what I have. I suppose you don’t think I should be able to own any of the civilian M14 derivatives either, just because it began as a military weapon, but the fact is that one with an 18 inch barrel makes a very good deer and hog rifle with appropriate ammunition (not military FMJ), and I guess you have a problem with the shotgun I keep for home defense, since it’s semi-auto and will hold 7 in the tube plus 1 in the chamber, and you think I “shouldn’t" need that, even if having to deal with 3 or 4 armed home invaders has become an all-too-common scenario in recent years. Incidentally, any idea why some people think anything with a bayonet lug on it should be banned? If anyone’s ever committed a mass murder with a battle rifle with bayonet attached, I have to admit, I’ve never heard of it; is there something about having a bayonet on it that makes it kill more people faster or deader, or is it just a matter of looks?Is this really the argument you're reduced to?
Literally, everyone I know that enjoys firearms would love to have an M60 or an RPG. But none of them do, because no one wants to go to prison. Shocker, because weapons bans actually work on the vast majority of people.
You wouldn't know a fact if it bit you on the nose.By posting facts?
this post sums up you’re not arguing in good faith.
And welcome to ignore.
Reading comprehension is not your strong suit I see. The point was about killing mass amounts of people and not some dispute between neighbors but thanks for playing.Such a great argument.
You know that video where the guy shot his neighbors for shoveling snow onto his property? If he didn’t have a gun, no doubt he would have run home and built him a bomb.
Innocent people are killed all the time from people choosing to drink and then drive. Should we all be made to get rid of our cars? You make some really dumb arguments!Nope. You're just playing semantics.
When you have the opportunity to prevent abuses and willfully choose not to prevent them, you're complicit in the abuses. But I understand why you refuse to admit it, because you know it highlights the fallacy in your argument.
This proves you don't know crap about the civil war! Democrats were the party of slavery, not conservatives!And I know all about the Civil War. It's where conservative traitors attempted to eliminate the United States because they wanted to keep owning black people.
God, you just gave me a woody describing that type of Utopia! If it meant getting rid of people like you and Watson sign me up!And don't go misconstruing what I mean. I don't want a war, just a peaceful separation. Then y'all can live with your guns and mass shootings and figure out how you're going to get by when most of the world won't associate with you.
And this right here is the problem with parts of society. When faced with facts he doesn't agree with he just chooses to ignore them.
Not a good way to go through life children.
Democrats were conservatives. At the time Republicans were liberal. That shifted throughout the end of the 19th century into the 20th century on the back of immigration and labor policies.This proves you don't know crap about the civil war! Democrats were the party of slavery, not conservatives!