well Clemson did put a signature on 13 opponents(L) with nary a single opponent staying closer that 21 points after 9-29. About as dominant as you get, 'Bama - Clemson #4 ought to be a war, and a prelude to 'Bama - Clemson #5 next fall. As it stands right now those 2 are on the front bus and all others are on the roy bus. The SEC is all behind Bama while UGA is close in talent they lack the coaching to beat them, the ACC is way behind Clemson with none with the players or coaching to beat them. Both conferences need to step it up!
Kind of surprised at the early line on the Clemson/Notre Dame
- Thread starter FrankiegoestoDollywood
- Start date
well Clemson did put a signature on 13 opponents(L) with nary a single opponent staying closer that 21 points after 9-29. About as dominant as you get, 'Bama - Clemson #4 ought to be a war, and a prelude to 'Bama - Clemson #5 next fall. As it stands right now those 2 are on the front bus and all others are on the roy bus. The SEC is all behind Bama while UGA is close in talent they lack the coaching to beat them, the ACC is way behind Clemson with none with the players or coaching to beat them. Both conferences need to step it up!
That's odd. If this is a pay site, then how is it that you can read and post without paying?
What needs to happen is people and teams need to ask the NCAA to take a hard look like in the late 70s and early 80s. These kids aren't staying at Clempson much less leaving the state's of Georgia, Florida, etc for nothing. Remember the 3 year TV and 3 year bowl ban? That is some serious cheating to get that type probation.
Last edited:
would have to be winning against a Texas A&M team with a New Coach, in his second game ever as the coach there, I KNOW I KNOW, A & M was totally Screwed out of that win by ACC refs, but hey.. a Win is a Win..
Of course not. Prior years have nothing to do with this year. This is a different year with different players and different results against different competition. Does that help clarify for you?
Why aren't you counting South Carolina as their signature win,you stated all week leading up to the rivalry game that we would be the best team that Clemson had played?
No i didnt!!! I said it would be one of the TWO best teams they played, If you are gonna quote me, dont LIE About what i wrote..
This is true. I remember you stating that a few times.No i didnt!!! I said it would be one of the TWO best teams they played, If you are gonna quote me, dont LIE About what i wrote..
Sweet Odin! I somehow made the mistake of thinking I was on TIF.
Uh, CU lost the last game they played in the CFP. Hope they repeat.
Who cares about Clumpsom or ND. Another easy one for the Tigers before they get there butts kicked by Alabama again..
This ! It’s more about Notre Dame not belonging than anything about taters
"To have gone to the game and lost is still better than never having been invited to the dance." - Voltaire or somebody really philosophical sort of like him.
Because sometimes the topics here are just better. Sometimes you guys are more cordial then some of the A-holes on the other site. Sometimes lol!
I can't argue that some of the Insiders are less than civil, or even informative, but at least our A-holes are Gamecocks.
I can't argue that some of the Insiders are less than civil, or even informative, but at least our A-holes are Gamecocks.
