ADVERTISEMENT

Not a single 5-star athlete started in the Super Bowl (link)

55vett

Member
Dec 23, 2000
563
105
43
Both Seattle's and New England's starting lineups were full of athletes who were 2- and 3-star recruits coming out of high school. Sure, 5-star recruits are great if you can get them, but there's no guarantee they'll take you to a championship. As Arkansas coach Bret Bielema just said in an interview on ESPN Radio, "I'll take an overachieving 2- or 3-star player any day over an underachieving 4- or 5-star player." Amen. Spurrier, Hoke & Co. will coach our boys up. Go Cocks!



SB Nation Super Bowl Recruiting Ratings
 
If I had one wish for 2015, it would be that a 5 star had played in that game. I've heard this as an excuse for losing players at least 20 times in the last few days. And I don't even care about the players we lost, I just hate hearing the excuses. If just one 5 star had played in that game, we wouldn't have to hear this so much. Recruiting high caliber players does matter.
 
A whole bunch of them start in college title games though.
 
Steve Logan, former ECU coach and now QB coach of the Niners, said it best when he said you can't win the Kentucky Derby on the back of a jackars. At the end of the day, you need studs. Looking at the past 10 yrs, the schools in the top 10 of the guru's rankings tend to make it to the big bowl/bcs games. That said, having a great coach (Patterson and Briles haven't had a top 20 class in a 5 years) can make a world of difference.
 
I bet there were quite a few in the final four. And there will be every year. There are exceptions but on the whole stars matter.
 
This OP is the kind of post you get from team on the outside looking in when it comes to a top 10 recruiting class.
But such a stat is irrelevant until they start letting college teams play in the Super Bowl.
What did Mark Twain say? there are lies, damn lies and statistics.

Fist off Statistics 101 tells you that the pool of available players who are 3 and 4 stars is MUCH larger than the 5 star recruits.
There may not be enough 5 star recruits in total over the last few years to field two teams of 22 players each.

So the odds are MUCH higher that there are more 3 stars than 5 stars.

The interesting question would be what percentage of 3 stars make the NFL and what percentage of 5 stars make the league?

Better yet, since I watch college sports to see my team win and not to see one player make the NFL, I would like to know the stars breakdown for recent BCS/playoff participants and national title winners.

You could also throw in some sports psychology and figure that there are more than a few super dedicated, disciplined 3 stars who get chips pn their shoulders and work their fannies off to prove everyone wrong. While more than a few 5 stars act like an NFL career is their God-given right and don't put in the work like the 3 stars do. That is all great for the NFL but I am a college football fan, so what are the star breakdowns for championship teams there?




This post was edited on 2/4 11:18 PM by CapHillCock
 
This is such a misleading stat. First off, rivals didn't even rate recruits by stars until 2002, so a player like Tom Brady wouldn't even have had a star ranking. Secondly there are only 30 or so 5 star players a year. So for the 14 years you are talking about a grand total of approximately 420 players. Given that the past three years of 5 star players are still not eligible to have been drafted yet, and this year's just signed, that subtracts 120 from the total. So that leaves only 300 approximately who could even be in the NFL, and that is assuming all of them lived up to their billing, had no injuries, given no retirements, no off field problems, etc. There are 32 teams so if they were evenly distributed and every single 5 star made it to the NFL there would still be less than 10 possible per team if every single one made it and was a star.

Common sense and a little logic tells you there likely was going to only be 1 or 2 per team at most. We know many 5 stars don't pan out for various reasons like Summers. We know some got injured like Marcus and had to quit football We know some had legal issues like Aaron Hernandez. We know many have likely retired by now. The fact there wasn't one starting shouldn't be a surprise at all.

Here is a stat they gave on Mike and Mike this morning that will indicated how important getting 5 star players can be. Since ESPN rated players in 2006, 22% of the draft eligible 5 star players were selected in the first round of the draft. That's a pretty high rate of success. That doesn't count players like Marcus who were still drafted, just the ones drafted in the first round. Stars aren't everything, but if you have a lot of highly rated players you are likely to be successful.
 
Really?! So I guess we need to go knocking down the doors of all the 2 and 3 star players out there! We need to have a class of nothing but 2 and 3 stars. Then we will win a title! Give me a break. This doesn't change anything. Go recruit a bunch of 2 stars and watch us win 2 games a year.
 
And there were only a couple of 4 star guys. Most were 3 and 2 star guys.
 
Originally posted by Laziness:
.... Since ESPN rated players in 2006, 22% of the draft eligible 5 star players were selected in the first round of the draft. ....
This is a very high percentage indeed
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT