He is the only one of the candidates that knows what he would be getting in to and how hard it is to recruit here. The rest have no clue! LOL
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It’s not hard to recruit Top 20 classes here. Top 20 is the norm here and you can win a lot of games with Top 20 classes and good coaching.He is the only one of the candidates that knows what he would be getting in to and how hard it is to recruit here. The rest have no clue! LOL
Yeah but the issue usually is that top 20 is usually 7-9 in the conference and 3-5th in our divisionIt’s not hard to recruit Top 20 classes here. Top 20 is the norm here and you can win a lot of games with Top 20 classes and good coaching.
I would sure as hell take that right nowYeah but the issue usually is that top 20 is usually 7-9 in the conference and 3-5th in our division
But he had a hall of fame head coach to help attract recruits also.He is the only one of the candidates that knows what he would be getting in to and how hard it is to recruit here. The rest have no clue! LOL
Beamer had Steve Spurrier to play up to recruits. Spurrier is no longer here. Besides, Muschamp recruited well here. He just couldn't coach nor manage a staff. Can Beamer? Any evidence that he can?He is the only one of the candidates that knows what he would be getting in to and how hard it is to recruit here. The rest have no clue! LOL
Well he had players from just about every position go to the nfl so either he didn’t recruit as well as the rankings indicate (same with end of sos era) or just some players got coaching?Beamer had Steve Spurrier to play up to recruits. Spurrier is no longer here. Besides, Muschamp recruited well here. He just couldn't coach nor manage a staff. Can Beamer? Any evidence that he can?
This is true and certainly part of the “unknown” with a guy like Beamer. I would also say though that for all the flack he seems to be catching with the “we would not be interested if his name were not Beamer” comments- that works both ways! The fact his name IS BEAMER gives him at least a little more clout with anyone who knows FB.. It is not Spurrier in 2005-2014 clout, but it is more than a guy like Chadwell has on a national stage. (Just a “for instance”, I am no knocking Chadwell, I’d be happy with him or Napier as well).But he had a hall of fame head coach to help attract recruits also.
Spurrier was a hell of a great coach at the USFL, Duke, Florida and SC. Not trying to run down Beamer. But the questions are in reference to as a team and staff. There is none.Well he had players from just about every position go to the nfl so either he didn’t recruit as well as the rankings indicate (same with end of sos era) or just some players got coaching?
If it's Beamer, and I'm predicting it will be, I'll support him like I did Muschamp even though I felt that would be a poor decision. Just hope the outcome is different this time .Like last time, I prefer someone with a track record of success as a Head Coach.This is true and certainly part of the “unknown” with a guy like Beamer. I would also say though that for all the flack he seems to be catching with the “we would not be interested if his name were not Beamer” comments- that works both ways! The fact his name IS BEAMER gives him at least a little more clout with anyone who knows FB.. It is not Spurrier in 2005-2014 clout, but it is more than a guy like Chadwell has on a national stage. (Just a “for instance”, I am no knocking Chadwell, I’d be happy with him or Napier as well).
The allure of Spurrier was not his name. It was that he had a history of winning big. With Shane, recruits won't know for sure whether he is more like Frank or Cheryl. Let's not fool ourselves about that.This is true and certainly part of the “unknown” with a guy like Beamer. I would also say though that for all the flack he seems to be catching with the “we would not be interested if his name were not Beamer” comments- that works both ways! The fact his name IS BEAMER gives him at least a little more clout with anyone who knows FB.. It is not Spurrier in 2005-2014 clout, but it is more than a guy like Chadwell has on a national stage. (Just a “for instance”, I am no knocking Chadwell, I’d be happy with him or Napier as well).
I don't think any of us have anything bad against Shane Beamer. I know I don't. I do believe that those of us who have posted anti-Beamer comments simply want someone who has proven that they can successfully handle the job of a Head Coach, someone who is proven. It's nothing personal against Shane. It's business.If it's Beamer, and I'm predicting it will be, I'll support him like I did Muschamp even though I felt that would be a poor decision. Just hope the outcome is different this time .Like last time, I prefer someone with a track record of success as a Head Coach.
Riiiggghhttt... He grew up playing for and coaching with and emulating the coaching style of HIS MOM. Ok..The allure of Spurrier was not his name. It was that he had a history of winning big. With Shane, recruits won't know for sure whether he is more like Frank or Cheryl. Let's not fool ourselves about that.
I think you know what I'm trying to say. Just because his father is Frank does not mean he would come anywhere near the success of Frank. Skip Holtz, Derek Dooley, Tommy Bowden and Terry Bowden have had nowhere near the success of their fathers. You won't find them in the Hall of Fame with their Dads, except as visitors.Riiiggghhttt... He grew up playing for and coaching with and emulating the coaching style of HIS MOM. Ok..