Comparing the discovery of bacteria living on Venus to the discussion of when life is defined for abortions was an appropriate comparative comment? I believe you are the only one resorting to ridicule and name calling here. I do appreciate the highbrow compliment though! Certainly better than the alternative! 👀
Here an article about the Nasa Scientist who found living organisms in Mars soil in the 1970s.
Appropriate... ok. Since "life" is being discussed in this thread, you certainly wouldn't have an issue with someone dropping a simple comment such as, "Black Lives Matter".
This is not about chemicals being present that allow life as we know it to exist. Life as we know it can NOT exist on venus! The surface temps are hot enough to MELT LEAD and the atmosphere is like 90% sulphuric acid... phosphine is not a building block of life, it is basically a gas-crated by the guts and feces of living organism or the rotting corpses of organisms.. (or in laboratories for specific industrial purposes). It is also existing in an environment in Venus’ clouds that would normally destroy phosphine rapidly, which means in essence it is being created as fast (faster?) than the environment destroys it... So if it it were brought in by a meteorite or something one off like that, it would disipate rapidly- something is replacing it in the atmosphere. Inorganic compounds do not produce this chemical normally apparently... So... Either organic compounds are creating it or there is a complex lab on Venus creating industrial chemicals. Either way it seems to be an indicator of life of some sort... Obviously as this is a surprise to scientists they readily admit is is proof that at the very least we need to study Venus more since this is not what we expected to find there!
Here an article about the Nasa Scientist who found living organisms in Mars soil in the 1970s.
Former NASA scientist says they found life on Mars in the 1970s
We may have already discovered the essence of life on Mars 40 years ago, according to a former NASA scientist.www.cnn.com
The experiment loosely described in This article is only one he talks about in other interviews. Back in the 1970s, Nasa’s criteria for positive life detection would have been about 3 million bacteria in approx a thimble full of soil. Levin was able conduct more sensitive tests of the same soil that could detect down to 300 bacteria in a thimble of soil.. he got a positive, Nasa’s criteria came up negative. Both results could be true, obviously, but Nasa would not confirm the findings below 3Million parts so they did not record his results.
This story also speaks to something else you said about how desperate the Search to prove life exists on other planets is and what a waste it is... If they were really so devoted and obsessed with proving this, why has no subsequent Mars rover been equipped with life detection kits? Similar to the ones described here, they have more sensitive detection equipment they Could easily add to the rovers and after such a close call once before, you would think those desperate to prove Extraterrestrial life exists might actually put kits on the rovers that could detect said life. The fact they have not is suspicious honestly...
Right... That is how they detect life. The chemical reactions are the consumption of the “food” they added to the soil... Put quite simply “dirt don’t eat”.
Sounds better than where I grew up TBH... Allendale SC needs to be consumed by an acid cloud! LOL
babylonbee.com
Lmao! This is so relevant to this thread in so many ways! Nice find!lol...Bee for the win, as always.
Scientists Walk Back 'Life On Venus' Claims After Revelation It Was Just An Unborn Baby
U.S.—Astronomers claiming to have detected signs of life on Venus were forced to walk back their claims after it was revealed that the supposed "life" was actually just an unborn human baby in an incubation pod left there by an unknown civilization.
Good! I am not a religious person myself but I certainly have no issues with anyone if they are.
Absolutely no problem. Black lives do indeed matter, and those in the womb as well.
You’re the one who claimed the poster was politicizing the matter. There was nothing political about It. His comment was a moral statement. I’ll assume you don’t understand that as I’ve made it clear twice now. As far as the ”highbrow” goes, it wasn’t intended as a compliment. I’ll assume also that you do understand that.
