Yes. He also tore his ACL for the 3rd time in that game. Stats prior to the injury were not pretty.
I'm certainly sorry he torn his ACL again. Don't get me wrong I wish Hill the very best.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes. He also tore his ACL for the 3rd time in that game. Stats prior to the injury were not pretty.
So, Hill certainly did not outperform Hillinski:
From Muschamp: "It was a very difficult decision. You look at our three scrimmages, which are the three benchmarks really in the evaluation. Ryan was the player of the day in the first one; Collin was in the second. Both of them played extremely well in the third. It was very difficult, a hard decision, but that's the decision that we made. As I've said before, we can win with both guys. We have great confidence in both guys and both guys know that."
Sorry, but I'd expect a more resounding endorsement of the starting QB than "that's the decision we made."
So they each won a scrimmage and were apparently tied in the 3rd. Sounds like it was a toss-up decision and Bobo got his boy in there. Hill, for all his touted knowledge of the system, in which he's been for the last 4 seasons, could only tie our sophomore who's had a few months with the system.
Yay. 🥳
Muschamp names starting quarterback for 2020 opener
The South Carolina Gamecocks have their starting quarterback.247sports.com
It’s no BFD. If Hill doesn’t hack it or gets injured, Hilinski will play.
Regarding the title of this thread, we have a coach and an athletic director that no other school would interview much less hire. It’s ok to demand better.
Lol. The poster is a bit ridiculousImagine- YOU starting another thread pouting about who the starting QB is... this might be a record in a day for someone on this site... You should consider getting behind the players/team, or pick another team to pull for. According to what you said on another post, you aren't going to support the team because a "non-gamecock" is going to start for us.
A lot of us get it, but it’s not worth a fight with the rah-rahs.I'm glad someone else gets it.
The scarnecchia thing still pisses me off. Muschamp absolutely didn’t give a damn apparently. Michael deserved better.Hilinski was literally hurt from the 2nd game on. He managed to still go out and give it his all despite being pounded every single game. I was at the Mizzou game and the kid was beat to death the entire game.
Hell of a reward. But to be honest after seeing Muskrat take a dump on Scarnecchia I expected no less. Muskrats a loser with bad karma.
That being said I hope Hill lights it up. I'm tired of losing.
He threw for 325 yards. We had 21 yards rushing as a team. Joyner was our leading rusher with 14 yards. QB play was not why we lost that game.How did Hillenski do against App State? At home no less! Stop acting like Hillenski is some type of god. He should have never been playing last year anyway. He might be good in the future but stop acting like the season is over because he wasn't chosen!
That’s what I been thinking!He might have had more talent on the offensive side of the ball at CSU. Whether we have SEC talent is completely debatable.
At this point, I think if Hillinski asked you to open wide, you'd do it.5 years into Muschamp’s tenure the (Supposedly) best option we have at QB is an injury prone grad transfer from Colorado State (of the MWC) who has played just one season’s worth of games in 4 years and hasn’t started a full season of football since 2015 in high school.
Pardon me for not breaking out the bubbly.
That was the last straw for me. He may have saved Muschamp's job with that victory.The scarnecchia thing still pisses me off. Muschamp absolutely didn’t give a damn apparently. Michael deserved better.
Bobo has forgot more about offense than anyone on this board knows.Of course this board knows offense better than Bobo.
Bobo has forgot more about offense than anyone on this board knows.
Bobo has forgot more about offense than anyone on this board knows.
Whatever he remembers it will be more than McClendon.Well, I hope Bobo remembers everything about offense he knows in the UT game.
61 posts. I think all 61 have been today, whining about the QB situation.
Whom should be used to refer to the object of a verb or preposition. When in doubt, try this simple trick: If you can replace the word with “he”’ or “’she,” use who. If you can replace it with “him” or “her,” use whom.chucktowncock, I have a grammar question for you. You are one of the best grammar gurus on the board and I mean that in a good way.
I can never remember when to use "who" or "whom". I remembered the rule along time ago but have since forgotten the correct usage. There was a little trick to remember how and when to use "whom" but it took me too long to remember the rule when I was trying to apply the trick it just wasn't worth the effort.
Anyway, in the following sentence is "who" and "whom" used correctly? "It is not for me to say "who" goes with "whom". (Meaning a romantic relationship).
Plus, do you have easy ways to remember the correct usage?
Whom should be used to refer to the object of a verb or preposition. When in doubt, try this simple trick: If you can replace the word with “he”’ or “’she,” use who. If you can replace it with “him” or “her,” use whom.
- Who should be used to refer to the subject of a sentence.
- Whom should be used to refer to the object of a verb or preposition.
Thanks very much! Could you please do me one last favor? Could you use "who" and "whom" in two different sentences as you describe the rules above? That would go along way with helping me to remember the correct usage.
As always thanks very much.
He didn't know who was coming to dinner. That was a problem because each plate was specialized and he did not know to whom each plate would go.Thanks very much! Could you please do me one last favor? Could you use "who" and "whom" in two different sentences as you describe the rules above? That would go along way with helping me to remember the correct usage.
As always thanks very much.
You’re walking a little funky … are your panties all bunched up in a wad today? Did someone say words that hurt you? Was there an argument, a cat fight, or a squabble that has you rattled today? Here are 4 steps to unwad your panties.5 years into Muschamp’s tenure the (Supposedly) best option we have at QB is an injury prone grad transfer from Colorado State (of the MWC) who has played just one season’s worth of games in 4 years and hasn’t started a full season of football since 2015 in high school.
Pardon me for not breaking out the bubbly.
He didn't know who was coming to dinner. That was a problem because each plate was specialized and he did not know to whom each plate would go.
Whom did you invite? Who is coming?
In case you still need it, friend. 😉
confucius say underestimate cocks at your own perilFirst year offenses almost always struggle. Boom and Coach Bobo know they really don't have grace to have an "adjusting" first year like most would have. Hill helps that tremendously. We shall see if it's the right call but listening to Bobo I don't even think it's close. They have said nice things about Ryan but I think that's there to be encouraging and not alienating. Smart and the right thing to do publicly. But play who can help you win, and right now they think that's Hill. I'm guessing they're right. We'll see.
What if the “system” sucks?I just don't get any of this. HIll has had more years and maturity to have experience in practice, the system, meetings etc than RH3 in one year in the system.
RH3 starting last year was more of a Best backup QB than best QB on the roster, no matter how often fans what the back-up to be the man, and it IS often from my perception.
My opinion is that if Bentley were still here, he would be starting instead of RH3 due to his experience probably being the difference. Again, JMO, he was on pace to set almost all our QB records and if he picked up the playbook then he is the man.
If Hill never came then in all likelihood RH3 would be a back-up if the roster was the same, with Doty pushing for playing time as a dual threat.
All things being equal, HIll knows the system and RH3 can take valuable reps as backup and become more familiar with the playbook.
I think we will see all 3 play. I am rooting for all of them and having a favorite doesn't make sense for me. Hoping we win some games with any of them