ADVERTISEMENT

scotus

Status
Not open for further replies.
Let me know when either of those things actually happens. I thought conservatives supported states' rights. Are we doing another switcheroo here?

We do believe in states rights. I though Democrats didn’t? Which is it? See how that goes?

The states have rights for sure, but they are directly affecting the entire nation with their vote, not just their state. There should be federal guidelines by which the federal government requires in order to accept the EC votes from a state for any federal position. If the states want to cook up some illegal nonsense to elect their majors then so be it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cybercock
Y'all lost by 3 million votes in 2016
And y'all lost by 7 million votes in 2020.

And now you think you can just ask judges to give you free votes
even after you clearly lost the cause.

Y'all are the ultimate snowflakes
And honesty has no place in your life.

You have no shame and your pride is misplaced.

Your fellow citizens
along with the rest of the world
look on incredulously
as your life is subsumed by television, groupthink and personality cults

But praise God
There is life beyond Anderson County
Come see the light and let the truth set you free
You show you lack of class and ignorance calling names like “snowflakes”. You show you are one of the many that make this country what it is becoming which is full of ignorance and people that don’t deserve the right to talk. Glad you show how classless you are and it’s people like you that deserve no platform of any kind. I am fine if you just go away.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cybercock
We do believe in states rights. I though Democrats didn’t? Which is it? See how that goes?

The states have rights for sure, but they are directly affecting the entire nation with their vote, not just their state. There should be federal guidelines by which the federal government requires in order to accept the EC votes from a state for any federal position. If the states want to cook up some illegal nonsense to elect their majors then so be it.

Texas only allowing one ballot dropoff location per county (and some of them are huge) isn't directly affecting the entire nation with their vote? Of course they are, but they have the right to run their elections as they see fit.
 
Actually they did. Technically they may have upheld some changes that were made in a manner that was against the PA constitution.
Read it like you want

Would you mind explaining how the changes violate Pennsylvania's constitution?
 
You show you lack of class and ignorance calling names like “snowflakes”. You show you are one of the many that make this country what it is becoming which is full of ignorance and people that don’t deserve the right to talk. Glad you show how classless you are and it’s people like you that deserve no platform of any kind. I am fine if you just go away.

F*ck your feelings
 
Where do you want me to research QNON, Newsmax or Fox. How about the National enquirer. Trump has some friends there apparently for cover ups.

It is called use some common sense. When your new source reports anything and everything, verified, fact checked or not that is anti-Trump and censors everthing pro-Trump or anti-Biden/Democrat, you should move on. Even Fox didn’t do that. They reported the news about how much Trump supposedly paid on his taxes, even though that was in theory “hacked” material as it should not have been made public. They left it up to the views to decide what to think of it. The MSM(CNN, MSNBC, NBC, ABC, CBS, etc) along with Twitter, Facebook and Google simply chose NOT to report and even censor any negative information about Biden or his son and hid behind the veil of “fact checking”, which is complete nonsense. Bottom line is that if your news source is not telling you what is out there and letting you decide, you are watching/reading/listening to the wrong source.
 
Texas only allowing one ballot dropoff location per county (and some of them are huge) isn't directly affecting the entire nation with their vote? Of course they are, but they have the right to run their elections as they see fit.

Again, bad precedent. If each state can do as they wish, we are in serious trouble.
 
  • Like
Reactions: andersoncountycock
Only the state legislators have the authority to make or change laws. The election laws of PA were changed without
Legislative authority.

Democrats are all of a sudden all about states rights. Activists judges legislating from the bench is not a problem, mainly because activists judges tend to be Democrats. Republican judges are much less likely to rule solely on their ideology vs the actual law. When the the last time one of the liberal Supreme Court justices broke rank?
 
It is called use some common sense. When your new source reports anything and everything, verified, fact checked or not that is anti-Trump and censors everthing pro-Trump or anti-Biden/Democrat, you should move on. Even Fox didn’t do that. They reported the news about how much Trump supposedly paid on his taxes, even though that was in theory “hacked” material as it should not have been made public. They left it up to the views to decide what to think of it. The MSM(CNN, MSNBC, NBC, ABC, CBS, etc) along with Twitter, Facebook and Google simply chose NOT to report and even censor any negative information about Biden or his son and hid behind the veil of “fact checking”, which is complete nonsense. Bottom line is that if your news source is not telling you what is out there and letting you decide, you are watching/reading/listening to the wrong source.

I'm well aware the the media has it out for Trump. Personally I read everything from MSM to far-left stuff to far-right stuff. I could read nothing but Trump's tweets and it would still be obvious that he needed to be voted out ASAP.
 
I think all of us here are against all voting fraud. That said, there's fraud in every election. Always has been. The important question is whether it occurred at a level sufficient to make a difference, and thus far no evidence to support such a claim has been presented.

The point you are making is the point democrats are making since the election. You are saying the candidate must immediately prove the amount of fraud was enough to change the outcome of the election. The media is running with this meme as a disinformation campaign. You could just as well say "bank fraud is ok so long as it does not deplete the Federal Reserve Bank". It is not up to a candidate to prove the fraud affected the election outcome, it is up to the election process to prove the election was fair, and there wasn't organized, widespread cheating whether the election was for President or school board.

There are so many modes of cheating on this election which I am not going to mention here, and they were all designed with cheating in mind. Think of every dollar in your bank account as a vote for you. The system doesn't have any problem keeping track of the dollars in your bank account, does it? Don't you think we could come up with some way of running a fair election if we wanted to?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cybercock
I rest my case. You are ignorant and everything I suspected. Have a great day

XZYBQ41.jpg
 
Democrats were the party of small government and states' rights back then, too.

Democrats and Republicans basically switched sides on racial issues decades ago, after the Civil Rights Acts were passed and Republicans embraced the Southern Strategy. This is common knowledge. The folks still attending Klan rallies and flying the Confederate flag aren't voting for Democrats in 2020.

That's pretty much a myth when it comes to switching parties. Only a democrat or two switch parties, but that happens all the time. Nice try...

Before the civil war, the democrats wanted their own rights to keep slaves..

Dick Harpootlian ~ "I don't want to buy the black votes, I want to rent them for a day."

Both the democrats and republicans want the same thing, power, money by sleeping with Communist China...
 
  • Like
Reactions: ansoncock
I think all of us here are against all voting fraud. That said, there's fraud in every election. Always has been. The important question is whether it occurred at a level sufficient to make a difference, and thus far no evidence to support such a claim has been presented.
Yes, that is the point. These lawsuits have moved from counting "legal votes" to just reversing the results. And only in states that Trump lost, of course. There is nothing noble about this effort. It is despicable to support these lawsuits. Ironically, these people call themselves patriots which we've known forever is bs.
 
Pointless to argue about this...those who see fraud are incensed, those who don't are elated. Using a sports analogy, it is not different to opposing teams arguing over a blown call. Both sides are not going change their opinion.
 
The fact that the GOP enabled this circus was pathetic, unAmerican, and depressing. Trump owns the GOP, and they are forced to go along. Trump has always been a conman. He connected with people that wanted respect and a voice. I get it. He is not a leader. He is destructive. It's not about 401ks and the price of gas.

The admiration for Trump is disturbing as a human.
Same can be said for do nothing for 47 years Biden. Can’t wait to see all the “good “ he accomplishes. Thank goodness he is here to save us from our destructive behavior
 
  • Sad
Reactions: josillor
That is pretty ignorant as well but the difference here is you calling people on here snowflakes. Why is that needed? It’s not, it’s wrong and you know it. That’s the problem. We all lump everyone into the same category instead of knowing people individually. I respond to you because of your direct inappropriate comments. These people are in general and wrong as well. I ignore people like them because they don’t represent me. You don’t either but to generally call everyone that doesn’t agree with you names is ignorant. Let anyone of any race demean someone of another race with name calling and all heck breaks lose but yet you see it as fine to do that. Again you are ignorant and talk like that and words you use shows a lack of intelligence. If you had much you could express yourself properly with intelligent language but you can only do so in four letters.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cybercock
That is pretty ignorant as well but the difference here is you calling people on here snowflakes. Why is that needed? It’s not, it’s wrong and you know it. That’s the problem. We all lump everyone into the same category instead of knowing people individually. I respond to you because of your direct inappropriate comments. These people are in general and wrong as well. I ignore people like them because they don’t represent me. You don’t either but to generally call everyone that doesn’t agree with you names is ignorant. Let anyone of any race demean someone of another race with name calling and all heck breaks lose but yet you see it as fine to do that. Again you are ignorant and talk like that and words you use shows a lack of intelligence. If you had much you could express yourself properly with intelligent language but you can only do so in four letters.

I didn't call anyone a snowflake. Guess you got me mixed up with someone else. Bless your heart.
 
You are never going to convince trump supporters of anything other than what trump tells them to believe. Remember when he stood & said that somehow this virus would disappear & nobody would be talking about it after the election? His supporters swallowed that whole & that mantra was heard of daily. Trouble is things are worse than ever & its covered nonstop all over everywhere except for certain people over at Fox. Don't blame them either, when you have egg all over your face you probably prefer to discuss other topics.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT