Originally posted by Judson1:
How is Clempson able to reel in 5-star kids from other states when we just can not do it? Just happened to see they had three of them. Surprised that one of them wasn't Hyatt who had been one for a while. One from UConn country? Seriously? It's not a coaches aren't doing this or that post. I'm certain they have tried. But if the kids not from SC we don't have a chance. Why? Facilities are on par or better. Conference will always be better. Are they up to their old tricks again? We can discount it if we want but 5 stars are difference makers in way more cases than not. And when I see a school with no perceived advantages over USC from the same state reel in three it does raise eyebrows. For both reasons. How they did it and why we can't. Oh and by the way after the last half decade or so it's obvious they are no better than us anymore. As they will often try to sell with the overall record. So with all things being equal now resting on our 5 game win streak isn't good enough anymore. Don't reference the past!
Excellent question and there are some fine answers above me. As a Clemson person, I'll throw my 2 cents into the ring.
There are some similarities and a great many differences between the two campuses. The key to recruiting is to maximize your advantages and minimize your disadvantages. There's nothing to do in Clemson NOTHING. Dabo and company have turned this into an advantage (especially with parents) by selling how hard it is to get in trouble in Clemson and how easy it is to focus on football and academics. USC is in the SEC, by far IMHO the best conference in the NCAA. I'm sure that you guys play that card as much as you can as well as the fact that you are an urban campus with lots of stuff to do. Each program tries and sells what it has. IMHO, it's pretty amusing that we don't overlap a LOT more than we do. It's a pretty small state. I'm sure that we both approach the same ball players (especially the elite ones) at some point, but it seems that players go one way or the other pretty quickly. I can't remember the last time a blue chipper sat at a press conference with a Clemson and a USC hat to choose between.
I do think that the Clemson/USC rivalry means a lot in-state. I also think that USC has had the advantage if not dominated in state recruiting for the last 5 years or so. However, I'd suggest that the rivalry doesn't mean nearly as much out of state. And it's out of state where Clemson has been making big strides in recruiting. I'd also suggest that for the last 3 years that Clemson's bowl schedule has been MUCH better for it's brand than USC's (even though both teams won all 3 and USC has a 4 bowl game streak going) LSU, Ohio State, and Oklahoma are perceived as national powers while Michigan, Wisconson, and Miami just aren't. Clemson got 'sexy' wins here that it was able to sell to recruits.
Finally, there's coaching/staff. SS is one of the finest game day coaches and game planners ever. Period. He knows how to build a winning program, to get the most out of his players, develop them well, and have a plan in place that uses his strengths against an opponent. He is far superior to Dabo in this. I'd also suggest that USC has done a far better job at S&C over the past few years although that may be changing For 4/5 games that USC won, they clearly dominated the LOS on both sides of the ball. The last win, I think that Clemson looked better on both sides of the ball, but 6 turnovers will get you beat most games. This season, Clemson clearly dominated the LOS again on both sides and won. Dabo on the other hand is a salesman. He knows how to build a brand and how to hire like minded people that share his vision and can do the tasks he needs them to (ie the nuts and bolts of football). I've been around Dabo on numerous occasions and he's without a doubt one of the best speakers and most optimistic people I've ever met. He also is a tireless worker. He honestly believes he can win every game, his program is the best in the country, and that he can get any recruit to come to Clemson
Delusional? Perhaps. And I'd think most of you here would say Definitely. But when you combine that with some moderate success and a relentless work ethic, you get a pretty powerful combination. I think that if SS has a weakness as a coach, it's in recruiting. It's no secret he doesn't like it much and at UF, he really didn't have to work that hard at it to get premium athletes. It's harder at USC and although you've done very well at it, I think that had more to do with the assistants and the chance to play in the SEC for one of the best coaches ever than SS going into a home and winning over a player and his parents. That kind of hit home this year with SS saying he's going to retire soon and the uncertainty with the staff at the end of the season.
Dabo and an assistant visited in home with every committed prospect between the USC game and the dead period (Dec 15th I think). I've HEARD (but don't know) that SS didn't visit anyone and that very little contact between commits and staff took place. If that's true then Dabo and company simply outworked SS and company.