Thank you for asking the question Kornblut....
- Thread starter ahs2008
- Start date
- Status
Jacob Blake. Phil said more evidence is coming out. Muschamp said he saw the video and the cop was wrong.
But obviously if muschamp says anything else he’d be canceled.
Your last statement is what makes this all so sad. People are unable to speak out.
They can speak out. They just risk a lot if they go against one side's narrative.
I don’t know about any narrative. I saw a man shot 7 times in the back. What did you see?
Did he resist arrest? Did anyone hear what he was saying? Only the police know. Muschamp is forced to side with his players until further evidence comes out. Either that or he is a big Democrat.
What if he was saying I'm going to get my knife and cut yall up? Now, I'm just throwing that out there..... hypothetically speaking
Last edited:
I saw a man refusing orders from an officer of the law, reaching into a vehicle for something that the officer feared was a weapon. And an officer did what he had to do given the man was a known violent criminal with a current warrant for a violent crime. A man who had already fought with the police only seconds earlier. It’s a tragedy that could’ve been avoided by the victim simply doing what he was told. 100% on the victim for what happened.
Would have liked Muschamp to use this as a teaching moment being a coach and all... like do your job when you're at your job and feel free to protest with his full support on your own time.
I saw a man shot 7 times in the back......
This is why Jacob Blake had a warrant out for his arrest
The cops involved in the shooting of Jacob Blake were attempting to arrest him for violating a restraining order stemming from an alleged sexual assault, The Post has learned.
nypost.com
🤷♂️
I saw cops protecting themselves because a criminal wouldn’t obey the law and put them in a terrible place by going to his car. If people don’t want to get shot by the cops stop doing crimes and when the law says to do something you do it. This is simple, be freaking accountable.
This is why Jacob Blake had a warrant out for his arrest
The cops involved in the shooting of Jacob Blake were attempting to arrest him for violating a restraining order stemming from an alleged sexual assault, The Post has learned.
🤷♂️
That seems like justification for the 7 shots in the back. I’m sure that was the proper response now.
No answer is going to satisfy him other than you would have rather the police officer been harmed or killed.
This guy gets it
Honestly does it matter where the police shoot a criminal who is not following their directions? He was reaching into the car, they have to assume he was going for a weapon, he was not following their commands, they can legally shoot him in a case like this.
Nope. Not quite sure if professional sports should be cancelled for this situation tho....
If you were one of those police officers, what would you do? They felt their lives were at risk and understandably so. If that guy had gotten his hands on a weapon—- those police have to make split second decisions
Yep, you saw that INSPITE OF THERE BEING 3 CHILDREN INSIDE THE SUV, the cop decided it was safer to shoot Jacob Blake 7 TIMES IN THE BACK, despite the fact that his (i.e. Jacob Blake's) 3 KIDS were merely a few feet from the target (i.e. Jacob Blake's spine).
So tell us, should the cop be held "accountable" for deciding to take those 7 shots despite the fact that 3 juveniles were only a few feet from his targets spine, or is it all Jacob's fault??
Further, had Jacob Blake known that the shooter cop was/is so gung-ho INSPITE of the necessary common since required as a responsibility of his position that the safety of the 3 juveniles in question were of no concern to him in the slightest (i.e. Barney Fife), would you opine that Mr. Blake would have even walked towards his 3 kids who were inside his SUV because he's just an old unaccountable hard core criminal??? Hail, no doubt that there's a concern in regards to a common sense issue, however the question is who's a fault for such in this case: Barney "shoot to kill" fife, or his target that he decided to fire his weapon at SEVEN TIMES in his back despite the 3 kids sitting in the car right where his gun was pointed????
Yeah, I still saw a man shot 7 times in the back. I suppose 1-2 shots in the back wasn’t enough in this situation. 7 was the appropriate amount.
No doubt...that’s the spin here so let’s roll with it, no? Hell, wondering why all the others didn’t unload their clips also, I mean, if you are gonna do something, do it right. They had no other choice it seems to bring this situation to a much better ending. Probably 21 shots in the back was called for amiright?
People can't seem to shut up anymore. In fact, they demand everybody echoes them.
people are arguing 2 different things and will never find common ground. forget about warrants and number of shots etc etc. everyone agrees that jacob blake was at a fault to some degree.
real question is about excessive force. is there no other way to subdue a man nowadays without Death, i.e. tackling him, shooting him in the forearm, or inventing some sort of device which tranquilizes these individuals in such a way that precludes death. thats the question.
real question is about excessive force. is there no other way to subdue a man nowadays without Death, i.e. tackling him, shooting him in the forearm, or inventing some sort of device which tranquilizes these individuals in such a way that precludes death. thats the question.
He wasn't unarmed. He had a knife. And refused to stop and not go into the car.
Calling a cop Barney Fife isn't sarcasm. Sure, it is a lame joke, but doesn't qualify as sarcasm. I was merely expounding on my knowledge of The Andy Griffith Show, while you defend the honor of a vile thug that would be a greater asset to society dead than alive.
Or could the criminal do what he's told and not put himself in that situation?
Nah, some would rather the kids in the vehicle see a cop get killed than the criminal.
He fought them. They tried to taze him and he avoided it somehow. He brandished a knife, and tried to get into his car.
How much crap and threat to their lives should someone have to deal with at their job?
again i think ppl are missing the bigger picture. theres no doubt that resisting arrest is a crime. this phenomenon (resisting arrest) will continue til the end of time. there needs to be an answer to the bigger Q... what do you do with these ppl without killing them.
It’s now known there was a gun in the car, so what else is there to argue? He had a gun and he had a violent past.
I can't wait for Muschamp fat ass to be fired. That's going to be a happy day.
- Status
