I really think they're all in shock at the way Muschamp and staff have recruited thus far, even though he has always been a great recruiter. 2 or 3 years ago the taters said that it was easy to recruit at places like Texas, LSU, Auburn, and UF, but Muschamp would NEVER be able to recruit that way at USC. Now that he is recruiting well they're saying, well, we always knew he was a great recruiter, but no way he'll be able to win at USC. I disagree.
During the 5peat they all said we don't care about losing to USC because Dabo is recruiting at a high level, winning in the ACC, and focused on building the program. They all of a sudden care about USC now that they're winning, but they refuse to acknowledge that Muschamp is doing exactly what Dabo did, recruiting at a high level and focused on building the program.
Tater logic: Clemson loses to USC but recruits well and wins in the ACC = Dabo focused on building the program (yes taters, I know Clemson played in BCS bowls DUE TO CONFERENCE AFFILIATION, since USC won head to head)
USC loses to Clemson but recruits well and competes in the SEC = USC sucks and had a really easy schedule