Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And can teach his players how to bunt!I want a home-run coach!
But, if he know's how to bunt, that's good too...
Haven't heard anything since the state reported the Bakich interview. If memory serves, Mike McGee knew Ray was his guy, he just had to sell him on coming here. I wonder, does Ray have a guy in mind? He said in his press conference that some candidates' teams are still playing. So is he just interviewing for a backup plan and already know who he wants, just has to sell it when their season is over? Or is he kicking tires and not sure yet?
Greg Lovelady was mentioned in a thread about hot coaches as possible candidates. What he did at Wright st and is doing at ucf is impressive. He played at Miami under Jim Morris and he's only 38. My concern would be the level of competition his teams have faced. Seems like he'd be worth interviewing
So no lovelady or bak-itch. Lol. What about snotlaggle or however you spell it?But, I would have a hard time with a coach named Lovelady coaching the Cocks... just saying.,,,
Even though 2020 is an eternity for high school kids, who are the players? Were they previously committed to us?All I know is he better hurry up. Two 2020 local boys committed to Monte this weekend that are players!
... and throws away an out most of the time.. there is not a statistical basis I have seen for bunting a guy over- especially just from first to second- the pros have pretty much quit doing it because it does not lead to more runs generally.I agree our new coach needs to be a good hitting coach but there is always a situation for a good bunt. Just move the runners up.
Kind of like the kid from Columbia playing for Wake Forest hitting over 300 this yr. Can't get them all I suppose.It starts much earlier than that, believe it or not. No, they were not committed to us--they both are in our backyards though--Dutch Fork & River Bluff.
I somewhat disagree but I see your point. Bunting the runner from 1st to 2nd scores that runner with a single that's the way it's supposed to work but our guys left them stranded. Too many times we'd load the bases with no, or one out and nothing happened. I say give up the out to move the runner but the next hitters have to hit not take call strike 3. But I do agree it seemed to be bunting was automatic with Chad.... and throws away an out most of the time.. there is not a statistical basis I have seen for bunting a guy over- especially just from first to second- the pros have pretty much quit doing it because it does not lead to more runs generally.
I somewhat disagree but I see your point. Bunting the runner from 1st to 2nd scores that runner with a single that's the way it's supposed to work but our guys left them stranded. Too many times we'd load the bases with no, or one out and nothing happened. I say give up the out to move the runner but the next hitters have to hit not take call strike 3. But I do agree it seemed to be bunting was automatic with Chad.
Russ Nixon.
All that sounds good unless the hitter misses the bunt sign and hits into a DP. Moving the runner eliminates that.Your expected runs scored goes down when you call for a sacrifice bunt. It's that simple. Even in the best case, you're trading a base for an out. Which is stupid. You only get 27 outs, three an inning. Giving one away for any reason is so dumb. It would be like giving up a down in football on second and 10 in exchange for 3 yards. We got 3 free yards! But now it's third and 7 and we have one down left to get the first down.
Worst case, your player can't even get the bunt down properly and you give away an out for nothing-- which is what Holbrook did all the time. Forget baseball, the man doesn't seem to have any common sense.
In the pros every hitter is a legit hitter, or at least should be but not so much in college. I'd rather take a chance (sometimes) bunting than hitting into the inning killing DP. It's all a gamble.... and throws away an out most of the time.. there is not a statistical basis I have seen for bunting a guy over- especially just from first to second- the pros have pretty much quit doing it because it does not lead to more runs generally.
is greg marshall still available?
Perfect analogy. Except I would say it is more like giving away a down on FIRST down to get three years a, as long as you are doubting the guy over when you have no outs, which is the only time people generally do it..Your expected runs scored goes down when you call for a sacrifice bunt. It's that simple. Even in the best case, you're trading a base for an out. Which is stupid. You only get 27 outs, three an inning. Giving one away for any reason is so dumb. It would be like giving up a down in football on second and 10 in exchange for 3 yards. We got 3 free yards! But now it's third and 7 and we have one down left to get the first down.
Worst case, your player can't even get the bunt down properly and you give away an out for nothing-- which is what Holbrook did all the time. Forget baseball, the man doesn't seem to have any common sense.
Perfect analogy. Except I would say it is more like giving away a down on FIRST down to get three years a, as long as you are doubting the guy over when you have no outs, which is the only time people generally do it..
Not saying I disagree with ya. But Destino left 14 men on base that whole 3 game series with 0 RBI. I looked it up. We should have sweep them. 6 times he was up with 2 men on. And 2 other times with 1 man on.Perfect analogy. Except I would say it is more like giving away a down on FIRST down to get three years a, as long as you are doubting the guy over when you have no outs, which is the only time people generally do it..
Also, if the runner is at SECOND with no outs, I see more value in the sac bunt... I don't know the stats on that but it seems to help if you get the guy to third with only one out, then you just need a fly ball or decent grounder to get them home!
And to be honest I think some mentioned this- I certainly would not fault him for trying some sac bunts when our bats were struggling the way they were, but to do it at the times he did it with the PLAYERS he asked to do it in the situations...
For example- when he took DESTINO OUT OF GHE GAME VS CELMZUN TO PUT IN A FRESHMAN SO THEY COULD TRY TO BUNT.... I was ready to fire him after THAT ONE CALL!! Alex was our best hitter, best power hitter, best RBI producer over the past three years!!! How do you take THAT GUY OUT IN THAT SITUATION!?!? To make the football reference- that would have been like taking LATTIMORE out of the game on 2nd and goal at the 1 yard line to put in some weakling freshman WR to run the ball in!