Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You certainly cant say its not all 100% true.
I'm not believing any coach said those things - on the record or off. Without attribution, the writer can claim anything. I'm calling BS on it straight across the board. This is the same type of crap you read every year.You certainly cant say its not all 100% true.
I'd come closer to believing "Alice in Wonderland".
I’ve always read these as 3 comments by 3 different coaches. I’m sure the coaches aren’t head coaches either.I mean, with Beamer its pure speculation on how he will do , but keeping Muschamp was not the answer, I dont think we wander in the desert for 40 years, at least I hope not
On the NFL players on defense we had and the results, I have posted similar, nothing ground breaking on that statement.
To sum up, the guy says how could we perform so bad on defense with all those future NFL players, but we should of kept the Defensive Guru Head Coach that produced those results?
Hmmm, Seems a little contradictory from paragraph to paragraph.
It's comments from different coaches. And the "keep Muschamp" crack was a dig at Beamer, not an endorsement of WM.It's funny how the first comment says they should have kept Muschamp, and the 3rd comment points out that the defense (Muschamp's supposed area of expertise) has been putrid, especially given the personnel.
That is not what the post said. Those are different statements from different people. The same person is not saying our D coaching was terrible (and it was) and we should have kept Muschamp (no).I mean, with Beamer its pure speculation on how he will do , but keeping Muschamp was not the answer, I dont think we wander in the desert for 40 years, at least I hope not
On the NFL players on defense we had and the results, I have posted similar, nothing ground breaking on that statement.
To sum up, the guy says how could we perform so bad on defense with all those future NFL players, but we should of kept the Defensive Guru Head Coach that produced those results?
Hmmm, Seems a little contradictory from paragraph to paragraph.
I'm not believing any coach said those things - on the record or off. Without attribution, the writer can claim anything. I'm calling BS on it straight across the board. This is the same type of crap you read every year.
You can safely disregard something that essentially repeats itself every year and is not attributed to specific people.I have to agree. These quotes are oddly specific and not really the areas that coaches comment on or discuss. The “voice” of these don’t really sound like coaches, but more like a few sports writers.
That is not what the post said. Those are different statements from different people. The same person is not saying our D coaching was terrible (and it was) and we should have kept Muschamp (no).
That’s why this hire was so important. If Beamer fails, you’re talking about probably 15 years of us being irrelevant before we even have a chance to be relevant again.I mean, with Beamer its pure speculation on how he will do , but keeping Muschamp was not the answer, I dont think we wander in the desert for 40 years, at least I hope not
On the NFL players on defense we had and the results, I have posted similar, nothing ground breaking on that statement.
To sum up, the guy says how could we perform so bad on defense with all those future NFL players, but we should of kept the Defensive Guru Head Coach that produced those results?
Hmmm, Seems a little contradictory from paragraph to paragraph.
That’s why this hire was so important. If Beamer fails, you’re talking about probably 15 years of us being irrelevant before we even have a chance to be relevant again.
Exactly what I'm thinking. Meanwhile, we are going to sneak up on them.Good! Let them think that...
Purportedly and highly questionably.It's comments from different coaches...
Everything is isn't a conspiracy. Finding assistant coaches that think SC football is mismanaged isn't much of a challenge.Purportedly and highly questionably.
I'm calling BS. Theses are smarmy "stories" designed to attract the gullible.Everything is isn't a conspiracy. Finding assistant coaches that think SC football is mismanaged isn't much of a challenge.
Probably where the hack got it from....and there is nothing I read that has not been said on this forum about the football team ad nauseam.
Well, there are such things as anonymous surveys, so...Probably where the hack got it from.
There's such a thing as BS also.Well, there are such things as anonymous surveys, so...
Very true. But both can be true at the same time.There's such a thing as BS also.
I think the same thing now as I've always thought: this is tawdry click-bait. This is somebody putting his belittling thoughts in the mouths of imaginary people.Very true. But both can be true at the same time.
Possibly, but this assumes there was no off-the-record/anonymous survey that pretty much only expressed thoughts that many other people have been doing ad nauseum. There is no way one can definitively do that.I think the same thing now as I've always thought: this is tawdry click-bait. This is somebody putting his belittling thoughts in the mouths of imaginary people.
For my part, it also assumes that, even were there some kind of survey, the article has nothing to do with the input received. Definitive or not, I can conclude it unabashedly. This is a gimmick formula designed to attract a certain kind of impressionable reader.Possibly, but this assumes there was no off-the-record/anonymous survey that pretty much only expressed thoughts that many other people have been doing ad nauseum. There is no way one can definitively do that.
I guess we'll agree to disagree on this one, King.For my part, it also assumes that, even were there some kind of survey, the article has nothing to do with the input received. Definitive or not, I can conclude it unabashedly. This is a gimmick formula designed to attract a certain kind of impressionable reader.
Agreed....every word. Still don't understand the group that's behind one guy instead of the football program. It sucks seeing the train coming with people around you talking about how pretty the lights are and how delightful the horn sounds.You certainly cant say its not all 100% true.
I didn't buy the magazines...and magazines don't form my opinions. But one thing many of you are missing here; if you don't think assistant coaches AREN'T thinking the things said on that tweet....then why didn't more than 2 "wanted" assistant football coaches come to USC?For my part, it also assumes that, even were there some kind of survey, the article has nothing to do with the input received. Definitive or not, I can conclude it unabashedly. This is a gimmick formula designed to attract a certain kind of impressionable reader.
They don't know anything about the staff because by and large...mostly none of them have done anything considered substantial in D1 football yet. That's why expectations are what they are, and that's why you have journalists, fans, opposing fans and most sane individuals expecting a train wreck because anything else would be a miracle.It's a good thing none of them know anything about this new staff and this year's team.
No argument about what people "think". That's a different narrative altogether. Mine is not about what people "think", but about this cheap and now predictable article format that some people salivate over.I didn't buy the magazines...and magazines don't form my opinions. But one thing many of you are missing here; if you don't think assistant coaches AREN'T thinking the things said on that tweet....then why didn't more than 2 "wanted" assistant football coaches come to USC?
These two have reasons for coming here....that have all to do with themselves and not the University or football program.
Stepp - the best hire without question including the HC....easy to see. He's at Arky ...playing in the SEC West...with a first time HC that has max 2-3 years left before a firing. He knows where that will end up. Yeah, Yeah...I know he's from SC. But, if LSU was hiring he would've gone there too...and he's not from Louisiana.
Gray - long time VT guy.... so he knows he has a chance to move up and has long been part of the Beamer family.