What's up with these old taters coming here....

[superflyby]

...did they send an email and let all these taters from 2005 and up come back on here? It is obvious that these guys with 1-50 posts and members since 2005 have been banned and now revived in this new format and for what....a little increase in traffic ? It's the only explanation that makes sense. I guess we are just going to have to wade through until each one gets banned again. Thanks GC....this is just what we were looking forward to....NOT !

 

[Anna_Nimmitty]

...did they send an email and let all these taters from 2005 and up come back on here? It is obvious that these guys with 1-50 posts and members since 2005 have been banned and now revived in this new format and for what....a little increase in traffic ? It's the only explanation that makes sense. I guess we are just going to have to wade through until each one gets banned again. Thanks GC....this is just what we were looking forward to....NOT !

Some are cool. Legaltiger is a good guy, as are esso2 and the one that sales x-mas trees (cant think of his UN at the moment).

 

[superflyby]

Some are cool. Legaltiger is a good guy, as are esso2 and the one that sales x-mas trees (cant think of his UN at the moment).

I guess my meaning was...why the ones that have been banned. I don't mind clemsux fans coming here and discussing things. The board is much better with other fan bases coming. My question is, if they were banned for a good reason, then why give them a free pass out ? It will be the same ole, same ole....and I think a traffic pick up was the reason....and that alone.....

 

[Anna_Nimmitty]

I guess my meaning was...why the ones that have been banned. I don't mind clemsux fans coming here and discussing things. The board is much better with other fan bases coming. My question is, if they were banned for a good reason, then why give them a free pass out ? It will be the same ole, same ole....and I think a traffic pick up was the reason....and that alone.....

Oh you're right. The three I mentioned are really the only ones I wouldn't ban if I were Shoe, Beck or TP.

Just sayin.

 

[AgnosticTrollCock]

I guess my meaning was...why the ones that have been banned. I don't mind clemsux fans coming here and discussing things. The board is much better with other fan bases coming. My question is, if they were banned for a good reason, then why give them a free pass out ? It will be the same ole, same ole....and I think a traffic pick up was the reason....and that alone.....

The new servers, site upgrades, and coding upgrades by rivals reset the ban lists.

 

[superflyby]

The new servers, site upgrades, and coding upgrades by rivals reset the ban lists.

They need to set them back...lol....ASAP.....

 

[cocktal]

Oh you're right. The three I mentioned are really the only ones I wouldn't ban if I were Shoe, Beck or TP.

Just sayin.

I joined tigernet and lasted about 3 weeks before being banned. I did not say anything out of the way.
I only stated some facts about Clemson's overall record in football, after a fan tried to compare their
record with Okla., Neb. Notre Dame etc. Welcome them here and when some of them start their
delusional rants, reply with facts and figures and show them up for the fools they are.

 

[superflyby]

I joined tigernet and lasted about 3 weeks before being banned. I did not say anything out of the way.
I only stated some facts about Clemson's overall record in football, after a fan tried to compare their
record with Okla., Neb. Notre Dame etc. Welcome them here and when some of them start their
delusional rants, reply with facts and figures and show them up for the fools they are.

The truth of the matter is they aren't here for a friendly exchange of facts. They are here to take a swipe at the program in general. I can deal with admitted taters, it's the ones that chose to take a swipe at our program while pretending to be one of us is the ones I have a problem with. They have no balls and they are the true trash on this board....lets play pretend...like a bunch of little girls...lol.

 

[section907]

The free site needs all the viewers it can get. It helps sells advertising. The board was already going down big time with posers over the past 2 years. This only makes it like another poster said, a trash talk site . There is not one thread on here that doesn't get hijacked by a poser in the 1st 2-3 responses Then they are all downhill afterwards. Plus the new view makes it near possible to weed out any good topics. If any , They are all 2-3 pages down. I know I don't swipe down 3 pages looking for current topics.

 

[Bigger_Stronger_Faster]

I joined tigernet and lasted about 3 weeks before being banned. I did not say anything out of the way.
I only stated some facts about Clemson's overall record in football, after a fan tried to compare their
record with Okla., Neb. Notre Dame etc. Welcome them here and when some of them start their
delusional rants, reply with facts and figures and show them up for the fools they are.

Not disagreeing with you but I've been on tigernet since 2003 and never got banned. I don't post there much at all any more but there were times in the past that I posted some pretty negative things about CU and still never got hammered...or than by CU posters. That board was fairly decent to talk sports on until sometime around 2007-2009 when there was a mass exodus from the TI free board, and all the tripe that used to hang out there migrated to tigernet. Which is one reason I don't post there or even visit much anymore...it's as bad or worse than TI ever was. The average IQ on that board is probably close to 65!

Now, TI...I have been banned several times. Once on the w/e after the 2009 game for responding to someone that wanted to know how to post pictures. It kinda turned to a habit after a while to see how long I could last. Sad, yeah. But it was entertaining on boring days!

 

[67gamecock]

The Klemrons are Masters of Deceit. The 'best' cheaters in the history of college football love to pretend they're Gamecock fans - then come on this Board and plant seeds of discontent. Most are TATERNET subscribers.

 

[MANAFOLD]

Since I've been banned on every Tater board the only way I can dispute the false irrational claims of these Mighty Tiger football experts is for them to crawl out from under their barns and visit our site.

 

[carolinamyke]

The jones guy is only tater poster who should definitely be banned soon. Imo

 

[usaguy40]

shilltiger is ok....not sure if he sells xmas trees......the other clowns may be old per say, but act like little children when they get on here

 

[Tigertrain1]

...did they send an email and let all these taters from 2005 and up come back on here? It is obvious that these guys with 1-50 posts and members since 2005 have been banned and now revived in this new format and for what....a little increase in traffic ? It's the only explanation that makes sense. I guess we are just going to have to wade through until each one gets banned again. Thanks GC....this is just what we were looking forward to....NOT !

 

[Tigertrain1]

I typically don't post combative material. I must have had a few beers. Anyway, I'm glad they lifted the ban. You guys had a nice long run, not sure I would have had much to say anyway

 

[Cocky kebo57]

I typically don't post combative material. I must have had a few beers. Anyway, I'm glad they lifted the ban. You guys had a nice long run, not sure I would have had much to say anyway

Well of course all you taters would be glad it was lifted. How would you like it if taterillustrated was suddenly flooded with "coots" that were trolling every thread???

 

[preebs2001]

Just a heads up....ConCOCKshon is UGA.

 

[usaguy40]

SAY WHAT!?!?!?..... we have a leghumper in the lines?!?!?!

 

[conCOCKshon]

Just a heads up....ConCOCKshon is UGA.

Really?