Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Where are they playing?They get #14 MSU this week.
What do you think?
If they beat MSU, they will crack the top 25.They get #14 MSU this week.
What do you think?
That's it. I'm a little less high on MSU than Rod is. It ought to be a heck of a game.If they beat MSU, they will crack the top 25.
That's it. I'm a little less high on MSU than Rod is. It ought to be a heck of a game.
Fair enough. It's much more advantageous for us if they prove to be mediocre. But I think they've become pretty good, and I think that will be a game worth watching.I wouldn't say I'm all that high on 'em. I just don't think very much of KY.
So, you're saying the UK coaches have done a better job coaching their boys up than our guys have?Everybody gets exercised about Clemson and Georgia, but I am more concerned about our inability to beat Kentucky. I only looked back 5 years (2014-2018), but we had higher ranked recruiting classes than UK every year, yet we lost on the field for 4 straight seasons. Even if you want to throw out Spurrier's last year, it still looks bad. This is an SEC opponent where the old saw of "we need to recruit better players" just does not hold water.
I'm actually fairly high on MSU. If they were in the East, they would be UGA's biggest threat. They always seem to have big, mean lines and RBs that run a punishing style the way UT's backs used to be under Phat Phil. I like their QB too. He's big, strong and deceptively fast and elusive.I wouldn't say I'm all that high on 'em. I just don't think very much of KY.
You're right, but some people, those who habitually place the cart before the horse, are seeking a path to our being ranked sooner instead of later, hence the interest in beating ranked opponents. We're always doing that around here.I think we need to worry more about actually beating UK than whether they will be ranked when we play them.
It's like the thread pre-season "what game is a must win". People listed all these other games. The list begins and ends with UK. It doesn't matter who else we beat, if we let them beat us for a 5th year in a row.You're right, but some people, those who habitually place the cart before the horse, are seeking a path to our being ranked sooner instead of later, hence the interest in beating ranked opponents. We're always doing that around here.
That would be ugly, and as usual, they have the skill people to give us absolute fits.It's like the thread pre-season "what game is a must win". People listed all these other games. The list begins and ends with UK. It doesn't matter who else we beat, if we let them beat us for a 5th year in a row.
Yes they do. And I do not feel good about that game at all.That would be ugly, and as usual, they have the skill people to give us absolute fits.
I fear Benny Snell Jr. will have about 150yds rushing....... Or Ky as a team will go over 200. After 2 games, I'm not comfortable with our ability to stop the run.Yes they do. And I do not feel good about that game at all.
I am not going down that rabbit hole, but on paper, our guys should be better than their guys.So, you're saying the UK coaches have done a better job coaching their boys up than our guys have?
Cats are 26th in the Coaches poll, and 31st in the AP, so IF and that's a tall task, we could upset the Dawgs, then definitely a top 25 ranked team.If they beat MSU, they will crack the top 25.
They're confident at least... and it seems like they're pretty well coached.Fair enough. It's much more advantageous for us if they prove to be mediocre. But I think they've become pretty good, and I think that will be a game worth watching.
I think maybe you're reading to much into the OP. I guess I was more interested in whether 1) UK would beat MSU and 2) if they do, do they get ranked at 3-0. I guess I could have asked that question, but I prefer to relate everything to us and our opponents.You're right, but some people, those who habitually place the cart before the horse, are seeking a path to our being ranked sooner instead of later, hence the interest in beating ranked opponents. We're always doing that around here.
Abrupt change of of subject, but is WVU for real and does Texas have anything for Oklahoma?But they won't
As long as our players aren't sitting around pondering UK's rankings this week, we should be OK. Well, we maybe not OK, but at least this banter among fans won't effect anything.I think we need to worry more about actually beating UK than whether they will be ranked when we play them.
I think TX lost to MD and didn't MD get blown out by Temple last weekend?Abrupt change of of subject, but is WVU for real and does Texas have anything for Oklahoma?
Everybody gets exercised about Clemson and Georgia, but I am more concerned about our inability to beat Kentucky. I only looked back 5 years (2014-2018), but we had higher ranked recruiting classes than UK every year, yet we lost on the field for 4 straight seasons. Even if you want to throw out Spurrier's last year, it still looks bad. This is an SEC opponent where the old saw of "we need to recruit better players" just does not hold water.
Abrupt change of of subject, but is WVU for real and does Texas have anything for Oklahoma?