Which was alot of you....why are you all so mad now?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Most of us predicted nothing.Which was alot of you....why are you all so mad now?
Happy to be at 6 wins, but I am not gloating about it. The performance against the weakest Clemson team in a decade was abysmal and does not make me feel warm and fuzzy. We are a 6-6 team that looks like a 3-9 team and probably should be a 3-9 team.Which was alot of you....why are you all so mad now?
Happy to be at 6 wins, but I am not gloating about it. The performance against the weakest Clemson team in a decade was abysmal and does not make me feel warm and fuzzy. We are a 6-6 team that looks like a 3-9 team and probably should be a 3-9 team.
They were still the worst Clemson team we have faced in 10 years.Clemson isn't weak on defense, just on offense and no one is talking about the first drive when we had them at 3rd and 15 and they ended up getting a first down towards an easy TD...
They were still the worst Clemson team we have faced in 10 years.
Which was alot of you....why are you all so mad now?
We're the only team they shutout.Clemson isn't weak on defense....
Not true...i can go back and pull up numerous post about pre season predictions....most were 3-4 wins what did all you football prophets think then?
Maybe Tanner should call the three schools and give the wins back. I'm not gloating either, but it feels like nothing will please some fans.Happy to be at 6 wins, but I am not gloating about it. The performance against the weakest Clemson team in a decade was abysmal and does not make me feel warm and fuzzy. We are a 6-6 team that looks like a 3-9 team and probably should be a 3-9 team.
How old are you? I predicted 4 wins and am not mad and to be honest most on here that predicted more wins didn't predict wins over Fla. and Auburn. The Clemson game should give you some perspective about where we are as a program. Granted, give Beamer credit, six wins this year was an achievement. But there were some predicting more than 6.Which was alot of you....why are you all so mad now?
Their Offense started coming around at the end of the season. All of the RB’s we’re healthy, their OL opened enough holes to give them running room.
That burned clock, kept the defense fresh, and they were able to shut us down.
That doesn’t excuse why we weren’t running slants and over the middle stuff to keep their LB’s back on their heels.
How old are you? I predicted 4 wins and am not mad and to be honest most on here that predicted more wins didn't predict wins over Fla. and Auburn. The Clemson game should give you some perspective about where we are as a program. Granted, give Beamer credit, six wins this year was an achievement. But there were some predicting more than 6.Which was alot of you....why are you all so mad now?
That would pretty much be everybody everywhere who predicted no more than 4 wins.
The talent level is fine. We legitimately had a chance to win 7 or 8 this season, based on how we finished. Clayton White made something out of nothing and that unit kept us in games.Anyone that predicted more than 6 wins was foolish. look at the talent level and the schedule.
I will say what I have always said. 6 wins is great. It exceeded pre-season expectations. The problem is that we just never had any identity on offense and didn't ever look like a well-coached, disciplined team.Maybe Tanner should call the three schools and give the wins back. I'm not gloating either, but it feels like nothing will please some fans.
Hell, I had a grand bet we wouldn't win more than 4. We squeaked by on 3 of the slugs we played, we caught UF in flux and actually played good, how the hell we actually won against Auburn, I can't explain. We go against a down ACC team in Clemson and get boatraced. Don't get cocky. We still suck. We need a real OC, Oline coach, receivers coach. But most of all, we need Jimmies and Joes. Beamer is a great chearleader. Reminds me of Dabo in hid first couple of years. But he got smart and hired ringers. Then they kicked ass. Beamer needs to do the same thing. Get some ringers and send that bunch of losers on down the road. JMOWhich was alot of you....why are you all so mad now?
I predicted 5 max. We did better. I'm happy about that. However, what I am disappointed in (not mad about) is that it appears we left 2 wins on the field...UK and Mizzou and that those loses seem to be on the coaches.Which was alot of you....why are you all so mad now?
Every team in the ACC scored on them and had close games with them. Good thing we not in the ACCClemson isn't weak on defense, just on offense and no one is talking about the first drive when we had them at 3rd and 15 and they ended up getting a first down towards an easy TD...
That didn't feel good...Clemson isn't weak on defense, just on offense and no one is talking about the first drive when we had them at 3rd and 15 and they ended up getting a first down towards an easy TD...
I defend this team a lot, but they aren't a top 5 defense, maybe their front 7 but a weak secondary and a bad level of competition over the season.Maybe, but we have the worst offensive line in the last 8 years... You're not going to score points against a top 5 defensive team in the country..
I really don't know why folks keep pointing to the UK game as outrageous that we lost. They finished 9-3 and have the 4th best SEC record behind UGA, Bama and Ole Miss. They are clearly better than us this year so maybe the only thing that truly is surprising about that game in retrospect is that we kept it that close. Would like to see them play Clempson in a bowl.Because with a serviceable offense we'd have won 7-8 games. UK shut us out in the first half and won 16-10. Missouri would have been a win. Our offense barely averaged 20 points per game this season (21-22 if you include DEFENSIVE TDs). The team overperformed, but it was mostly our rebuilt DEFENSE that kept us in games. I'm happy with how we played for the most part. However, it's unrealistic to be okay with the offensive product that was displayed this season -- especially after the big game Satterfield (who was fired from Tennessee Tech for failing to produce a serviceable product) talked.
It's become clear that Marcus Satterfield's offense will cost us games and top offensive recruits don't want to play for him. Fans are mad because they don't want to watch an anemic offense coached by him either.
no...us Gamecock fans are happy to win each and every game we were able to. But....most years in the SEC you don't have a situation AT Florida like they had this year to rely on, and you don't get a first year SEC HC with 3 key offensive/point producing starters out (Auburn) to rely on either.Which was alot of you....why are you all so mad now?
I never predicted anything but some were making their predictions based on a solid schedule that didn’t include a complete implosion by Florida or Auburn.Which was alot of you....why are you all so mad now?
For the most part it still looked like a 3 win team, if it wasn't for alot of teams going full retard in game. ECU and Vandy all but had it wrapped up. ECU decided to throw the pick 6 before the half instead of run and take the 3 to go up 17-0, then Vandy decided to go Prevent late and give Noland forever to throw. Alot of freebies gave a 3 win team 6 wins. AU was a cluster tooWhich was alot of you....why are you all so mad now?