Yep. One day we will realize results is what matters. One day we will get sick of Clemson competing at the highest level and we will demand excellence too. It will take changes at the top which will take years though
Taters vs Bama rematch in title game..
- Thread starter jonesz21
- Start date
- Status
Yep. One day we will realize results is what matters. One day we will get sick of Clemson competing at the highest level and we will demand excellence too. It will take changes at the top which will take years though
Wait. You want to fire the guy you literally just hired and who took you to a bowl game with a depleted roster. Seems legit.....
Bama has to get to 17-20 points to win. Watson may throw a couple picks but you're right, if Bama can't run the ball the taters could pull it out.
Agree 100%. I started a thread on that at some point... essentially that Dabo was golden once he started recruiting well because there are four or five conference wins and two more small non-conference schools every year that are just wins, no matter what. Clemson might be the best football job in the U.S.
This is 100% the truth. It is, and has always been, the difference between USC and Clemson.
You posted completely different numbers in another thread several days ago. I believe you said 128 out of his 329 completions were behind the line of scrimmage. I'm no mathematician, but that's more than 25%.
I don't know that Clemson can stop Scarborough. I also think that if Watson throws interceptions Bama might take one to the house.
Boy would I love to see Bo run Boulware clean the hell over on the way to the house. Bama will try to overpower the taters with their running game while the taters will use misdirection & trickeration to move the ball. An interesting rematch for sure.
I fear that Clemson will win. But, if I have to put my money on the game, I'd pick Alabama to win.
This is a retarded comment clearly hasn't watched any of Watson's pass attempts this year.
Bama s best corner got hurt few weeks ago. It has hurt their secondary. BUT bamas D is lots better than Ohio state and bama Also has an offense with a pulse. Ohio state does not. If n c state and oitt and Troy can basically out play taters why can't bama ?
.
Bama's best play is to run Scarborough to the left, behind Cam Robinson, out of the pistol. There's no Shaq Lawson to that side this year, so Boulware will have plenty of opportunities to make tackles.
.
Bama's best play is to run Scarborough to the left, behind Cam Robinson, out of the pistol. There's no Shaq Lawson to that side this year, so Boulware will have plenty of opportunities to make tackles.
.
Sorry these percentages were based on number of attempts. Here is a chart that is up to date through the ACCCG. If you combine BLOS and 0-5 it comes our to 49% of his attempts. I am not sure where that stands on college because of the variety of offense that are run. If you compare it to NFL numbers its only a few percent higher. The average this past season for BLOS and 0-5 combined was around 42%.
If Alabama forces Watson to pass, the game won't be close. He was very close to throwing 4 INTs last night and his only TD pass was underthrown by about 5 yards. Very good athlete, but not a great passing QB. 3 picks against Bama and he will have 20 for the season.
Its true he has been baited a few times into some bad throws and tried to fit it in places he shouldnt have a few times. That being said a bunch of his INTs were not of his making. Leggett caught one and had it snatched out of his hand by the DB. He has had 3 or 4 batted up at the line and picked(I blame O line for those, gotta get those hands down). McCloud had one go through his hands(perfect throw) hit him in shoulder and bounce right into DBs hands. Not saying Watson isnt to blame for a good bit of his INTs but not all picks are the same and not all of them are bad decisions or bad throws.
If the Taters luck up and beat Bama it won't do a damn thing for the State of SC, much less USC. You'll never hear the end of it. They're still talking about their 1981 mythical NC. I'll never pull for Clem in any game, period. Happy New Year!
Me and my wife are Clemson but she cheers for y'all saying the same thing. I don't get it haha
I just want the best team to win. If that's Clemson, then good for them
I just want Klempson to lose to who ever they play. I admire that they to a 5 year beat down from us and turned that around, but them winning does not help USC. If anything it hurts USC. I think WM turns our program around, but it has nothing to do with Klempson winning.
Well to hear them tell it the reason we got a few of our recruits is because they are doing so well they couldn't take them. smh
myth·i·cal
ˈmiTHək(ə)l/
adjective
adjective: mythical
occurring in or characteristic of myths or folk tales.
"one of Denmark's greatest mythical heroes"
synonyms: legendary, mythological, fabled, fabulous, folkloric, fairy-tale, storybook;More
fantastical, imaginary, imagined, fictitious, storied
"mythical beasts"
- idealized, especially with reference to the past.
"a mythical age of contentment and social order" - fictitious.
"a mythical customer whose name appears in brochures"
synonyms: imaginary, fictitious, make-believe, fantasy, invented, made-up, nonexistent;
informalpretend
"her mythical child"
Last edited:
Obviously they aren't correlated, but if the taters beating Bama guaranteed us an SEC championship next year, I still wouldn't take that offer. The Taters winning a natty will be the worst thing for this state. I can already see the dumb speech dablow would give......
Everyone is obligated to be Bama fans through and through. The better the SEC, the more money the league makes, the more money we make. To pull against the SEC is choosing to take money from our school....period.
Everyone is obligated to be Bama fans through and through. The better the SEC, the more money the league makes, the more money we make. To pull against the SEC is choosing to take money from our school....period.
Wouldn't pull for Clemson if they were playing the USSR in 1985. Hope people with that mentality enjoy seeing the Clemson flag flying over the State House and Dabo yucking it up in the White House.
Raised Tide but Gamecock educated and no way Iam pulling for dat boy.
Will never pull for those upstate turds in anything! Roll Tide!!
Being and Gamecock and pulling for Klempson is a mental disorder.
Sometimes you just need to get over it...
My son is a Clemson Student and is a former Carolina student and Carolina fan.. You can be both...
Living in the upstate, I really would hate for Clemson to win. I remember 1981 and how they were then. Can you imagine them winning with Dabo being a coach that controls the media. We will never get any coverage.
I hope you are not paying for any of it.
You got to be kidding? Pull for the taters? Not even with a loaded orange howitzer pointed at my head could I succumb to such dumbness. We would have to hear it for the next 1000 years how great they are. I hope they get rolled 60-0. I don't believe that to be the score but I can wish.
I am 70 years old, live closer to Clemson than Columbia, been a Gamecock club member for 47 years, and have NEVER pulled for The Taters . yes Never and Never will. Case closed
A
anon_n4c0cp5zhdxn7
Guest
I can't think of ANY realistic scenario where I would/could pull for Clemson. Their fans are just plain HORRIBLE.
- Status
Similar threads
