Recruiting means nothing if you can’t coach to their potential, and so far that has been Muschamps track record. It makes for more excitement on the recruiting front, but that much more disappointment when you lose. And he definitely has a penchant for losing.
BMac vs Bobo
- Thread starter Cockish
- Start date
I wonder where our offensive “parts” rank within our conference, especially since we are now playing a conference only schedule. If we, for instance, ranked each offensive group by talent/ability versus the rest of the conference, where might each unit be ranked? Thoughts appreciated, and rank by a simple system of 1-14. Takes a little research to have an educated opinion tbh. We all follow the QB position enough to have a decent opinion, but what about the other position groups? For instance, do you know how good/bad an OL KY has? Do you know the league’s TE positions? Which teams have the best WR talent? Etc......the true answers go a long way in evaluating Bobo’s performance year one. I think most will be surprised to find out how low most of these units are in talent versus the rest of our scheduled opponents this year. A case can certainly be made some of this is due to development, SC seems to have recruited decent “star rating” quality at some spots, though overall the team trend is typically ranked 7-9 seasonally in SEC recruiting rankings. Myself, I don’t see any group in the top half, with the exception being QB if Hillinski or Hill show out..which if true means we have to coach the hell out of these players this year to win 5 or more games and have better gameday coaching/strategy. Haven’t seen much of that yet.
Rank each 1-14 within the SEC: (appreciate all opinions and looking fwd to thoughts from GC fans)
QB
OL
RB/FB
WR
TE
Rank each 1-14 within the SEC: (appreciate all opinions and looking fwd to thoughts from GC fans)
QB
OL
RB/FB
WR
TE
Last edited:
Yup.
He's missing something other coaches that are winning have. He changes coaches like oil, and still finds ways to lose.
I don’t know that we would be in the top half in any category. I know QB wise we like to think we are okay based on recruiting rankings but as of Saturday we are still hearing there is a QB battle and I highly doubt Muschamp is trying to trick Tenn ahead of the opener.
You doubt that Muschamp isn’t being truthful about the depth chat? As if he’s always been up front about that.
Nah. The best kid always played at QB. Unless that kid wasn't Jake Bentley.
I don’t think he knows enough about what makes good QB play to be coy about anything.
Which I would see as a pretty clear indication that there isn’t a massive overload of talent at that position.
Agree about most of your thoughts. Those are the games that I see that I feel like we have a shot at winning. Some are definitely a stretch but I have put in place the Georgia factor. That being that the game is not lost before it is played. TAMU at home after a bye week is a huge plus. The week before Georgia was our bye last year. We had a good game plan for that game.
Well, if I have to explain it loses the effect. That you can find no humor in our struggles and that Muschamp wouldn't pull Bentley even when it seemed to the detriment of the team, then I don't know what to tell you.
If I have to explain that it was a bad joke, then I don’t know what to tell you.
That's why I said you should loosen your bolts. You're the only one to take exception.
Haha ok buddy. It was a great joke! Really thought provoking and deep. Keep telling it.
No one said you have to like it. Obviously I wasn't posting for your personal entertainment. I mean this has dragged out 7 posts more than it needed to. But hey, you didn't like it. Not trying to please everyone.
Bobo is a Pro-style QB OC, not dual threat. Not saying he won't change in years to come. So that favors CH and RH. So who knows what we will be in 2-3 years. With a free year, next year may be like this year.
The same could have been said about Spurrier. But arguably our best QB was dual threat under his watch.
Similar threads
