ADVERTISEMENT

Clemson fans blame Tanner for not receiving national seed

It probably didn't help them that out of the top 6 teams in the ACC (other than themselves), they didn't play 2 (UNC and Duke), got swept by one (NCSU), went .500 against another (FSU), and only beat one (UL, 2-1).
 
It probably didn't help them that out of the top 6 teams in the ACC (other than themselves), they didn't play 2 (UNC and Duke), got swept by one (NCSU), went .500 against another (FSU), and only beat one (UL, 2-1).
I listened to the Tanner response about seeding and he basically said, " Although Clemson had better record than UNC they were tied in conference play but the fact Clem got swept by NCSt and did not play UNC, UNC got the go ahead. FSU was based on winning ACC tourney and great close to the season."
 
But there AD is on the NCAA football championship committee . How ironic


because no one else would have voted Clemson in the past 3 years? come on....

Clemson lost the national seed on Saturday head to head against FSU...

The only thing I blame on Tanner happened in Omah a couple years back. ugh....
 
because no one else would have voted Clemson in the past 3 years? come on....

Clemson lost the national seed on Saturday head to head against FSU...

The only thing I blame on Tanner happened in Omah a couple years back. ugh....

Clemson won the regular-season series vs FSU, though, right? Seems like the conference tournament games count too much.
 
Ray may have a history of beating the taters when it matters the most (see Omaha). But, in this case, the taters can only blame themselves! :)
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT