ADVERTISEMENT

Clemson

Didn't look like it this year. The lack of Watson, Lawrence, and Etiene might have something to do with it. They were playmakers even with busted or basic plays.
DJU is not like the other 2. He is wildly inaccurate so we couldn’t get too sexy with playcalling. My biggest criticism of Elliot is sticking with the plan to throw it around long after it was clear DJU couldn’t throw accurately with any consistency. If we had decided to run more in game 3 or 4 we likely are playing next weekend.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tigerclamp
DJU is not like the other 2. He is wildly inaccurate so we couldn’t get too sexy with playcalling. My biggest criticism of Elliot is sticking with the plan to throw it around long after it was clear DJU couldn’t throw accurately with any consistency. If we had decided to run more in game 3 or 4 we likely are playing next weekend.
But the OL had issues too. And the RB's aren't Etienne.

That is why they kept throwing it. And Elliott (and Dabo) were hoping the light bulb would turn on in DJU's head, and he would transform into the QB from the ND game last year.

DJU isn't the threat to run like Lawrence and Watson were threats to run. That offense works when the QB is a threat to run. It opens everything else. The play-action, etc.

DJU prefers the pocket, but he stares down receivers and can't really read the field.

If they their OL was better and DJU played like he did against ND last year, then they would have played next weekend.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GCDC1959
But the OL had issues too. And the RB's aren't Etienne.

That is why they kept throwing it. And Elliott (and Dabo) were hoping the light bulb would turn on in DJU's head, and he would transform into the QB from the ND game last year.

DJU isn't the threat to run like Lawrence and Watson were threats to run. That offense works when the QB is a threat to run. It opens everything else. The play-action, etc.

DJU prefers the pocket, but he stares down receivers and can't really read the field.

If they their OL was better and DJU played like he did against ND last year, then they would have played next weekend.
It’s definitely better when there is a running threat but the key to the whole offense is RHYTHM, which you cannot achieve with a QB that can’t hit the broadside of a barn.
Elliot is an easy scapegoat but in reality his hands have been tied this year. The backs are good - better overall than years past (Etienne is clearly better than any of them) but there is no deep threat on the outside and every throw is an adventure.
If he would have changed gears in game 3 or 4 instead of game 8 things would have been different.
 
Dude with Boom4life handle wants to talk about stupidity.
I don’t realize you could change it once a year and didn’t want to lose my join date and stuff. I have put in a request for it to be changed waiting on an approval from a mod.
 
Clemson's roster is full of players from the playoff and championship years. I've noticed a drop-off in recruiting this year and now they won't be on the National stage this coming year. I'm not sure they'll be replacing the talent leaving over the next few years with talent that's coming in. One thing for sure they have much more than SC but having the same HC in place and years of playoffs they're supposed to.
 
It’s definitely better when there is a running threat but the key to the whole offense is RHYTHM, which you cannot achieve with a QB that can’t hit the broadside of a barn.
Elliot is an easy scapegoat but in reality his hands have been tied this year. The backs are good - better overall than years past (Etienne is clearly better than any of them) but there is no deep threat on the outside and every throw is an adventure.
If he would have changed gears in game 3 or 4 instead of game 8 things would have been different.
They couldn't really change gears because of the OL problems too as well as DJU. You won't have rhythm with those two problems, which are major problems. The RB's were young and still learning as they go.

Elliot is okay when you have talented playmakers. He keeps it simple,and lets his playmakers be playmakers. There is a lot to be said for that too. With inexperience and/or deficiencies, then you need something more.

I think Clemson record reflects who they are this year. They had some close wins that could have gone the other way too.
 
I don’t realize you could change it once a year and didn’t want to lose my join date and stuff. I have put in a request for it to be changed waiting on an approval from a mod.
It's gonna be harder to replace your "I Love Boom" back tattoo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pauliecock
Gotta pay the players to get them. The elite talent want to cash in. Clemson was willing to pay their price to get this going. We need to do the same. It’s the only way. I’m not talking NIL or this Garnet thing. I’m talking about some real cash/payoffs etc that can’t be traced back to the program. Funnel it through a Church like Auburn and Clemson. I may need to look up the meaning of laundering or a how to but there has to be a way.
You can’t be serious. I see post like this pretty often on here. We should accept that they recruit good players, they develop them well, and the coach them well. To me, that is much easier to believe than this nonsense.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT