ADVERTISEMENT

Committee chair said we didn't get in because only 1 top 50 win...

If we had beat UGA all three times would we have gotten in? Would still only be 1 top 50 win.
 
That is the problem with this whole system. They use different criteria for different teams. Too easy to justify mind boggling choices without using the same standards.
 
And that was A&M, said Tulsa had 2.....

so if we would have beat a couple of top 50 teams, but lost to 8 or 9 shitty teams like Tulsa (the lost 11 total and 1 was to us), we would be in by their standard. It's a joke..........they make up a different BS scenario every year to explain their screw ups.
 
so if we would have beat a couple of top 50 teams, but lost to 8 or 9 shitty teams like Tulsa (the lost 11 total and 1 was to us), we would be in by their standard. It's a joke..........they make up a different BS scenario every year to explain their screw ups.

Yep, and Syracuse and their crappy record gets in because well...they're Syracuse and they always belong in the tournament.
 
so if we would have beat a couple of top 50 teams, but lost to 8 or 9 shitty teams like Tulsa (the lost 11 total and 1 was to us), we would be in by their standard. It's a joke..........they make up a different BS scenario every year to explain their screw ups.
And what f-ing conference is Tulsa in? What a fricking joke. How much money did the NCAA lose - just in ticket sales - by inviting Tulsa instead? Someone do some math. SDS? Help us out here.
 
Last edited:
Face it, we folded down the stretch. The way we were playing, there's a good chance we would have been one and done in the tournament.
 
Tulsa had 4, Syracuse had 3, Vandy had 2....we had 1. These are wins against the top 50. We can make the argument that we beat Tulsa and Vandy, but the teams we were anticipating as being top 50, were not (Florida, Vandy). The only things that Vandy can really lean on is that they beat the co-champs of the SEC and lost to many others that for whatever reason they still get credit for playing.

Syracuse, beat Duke, A&M, and UCONN. Of course UCONN winning their conference tourney boost their resume even more. (T&M beating Kentucky may have helped us).

Tulsa beat Wichita State, SMU, UCONN and Cincy which continued to help Tulsa in the RPI because they collected a couple of important wins which kept them in the top 50.

Vandy and Florida who are typically decent couldn't stay in the top 50 to help us. St John's, South Florida, Drexel who we thought were decent teams (St John's was a tourney team last year) have important players leave.

Lastly, we laid eggs vs Georgia, Mizzou, Tenn, Miss State

We controlled our own destiny and let it slip away.
 
Tulsa had 4, Syracuse had 3, Vandy had 2....we had 1. These are wins against the top 50. We can make the argument that we beat Tulsa and Vandy, but the teams we were anticipating as being top 50, were not (Florida, Vandy). The only things that Vandy can really lean on is that they beat the co-champs of the SEC and lost to many others that for whatever reason they still get credit for playing.

Syracuse, beat Duke, A&M, and UCONN. Of course UCONN winning their conference tourney boost their resume even more. (T&M beating Kentucky may have helped us).

Tulsa beat Wichita State, SMU, UCONN and Cincy which continued to help Tulsa in the RPI because they collected a couple of important wins which kept them in the top 50.

Vandy and Florida who are typically decent couldn't stay in the top 50 to help us. St John's, South Florida, Drexel who we thought were decent teams (St John's was a tourney team last year) have important players leave.

Lastly, we laid eggs vs Georgia, Mizzou, Tenn, Miss State

We controlled our own destiny and let it slip away.
1-1 against the top 50....5-1 against the top 60.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whythis28
Face it, we folded down the stretch. The way we were playing, there's a good chance we would have been one and done in the tournament.
So? It still doesn't mean you should not get in. This team deserved to be there over Vandy, Tulsa and Syracuse. Total BS.
 
Yep, and Syracuse and their crappy record gets in because well...they're Syracuse and they always belong in the tournament.
But but but Syracuse play the first part of the season with out there lying cheating no good head coach,so now we reward them with a bit.cant believe it, what a joke. Go Cocks
 
  • Like
Reactions: GamecockJL
And you lost to Missouri, Ten, and Miss St, Clemson isn't a terrible team, they went 10-8 in the Acc, and beat Duke, Miami, Pitt, and Lville.

You do know that we whipped Clemson at their place and also St. John at their place....you don't deserve to be in the tournament for many reasons, including your cheating.
 
You do know that we whipped Clemson at their place and also St. John at their place....you don't deserve to be in the tournament for many reasons, including your cheating.

So because of that you should be in the tournament.How did we cheat? What are the other reasons?
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT