I agree the jury is still out on CH as the head man after 2 years. However, it has only been 2 years. I thought before I jumped on the anti CH bandwagon I'd do a little digging and i was surprised with what I found out. I only looked at conference records since I believe what we did over the whole season is in the toughest conference in baseball is what should count. Here is some of what I found.
RT's was here 12 years before CH arrived as an assistant. The last 4 years before CH got here our SEC winning % was .525 and during those 4 years was never higher than .5667. Was it clear that Ray had lost it and was slowly losing his grip on the program? Had the game passed him by? After all, RT previous best 4 year run was 2000-2003 and had an SEC winning % .6891. The program had clearly dropped off a cliff.
During RT's last 4 years , our SEC winning % jumped to .6555. Those last 4 years, CH was RT's top assistant. Maybe that is just a coincidence. Maybe it had nothing to do with the addition of an assistant that had helped UNC to 2 CWS finals. A place UNC has not returned to since he left but maybe that is just a coincidence as well.
Maybe it is a case of CH being a great assistant but not being able to cut it as the head guy. That may prove out but there isn't much evidence so far, let's look at CH's SEC winning %. CH has had a small sample size to go by as the head man but it ain't too shabby. A .5932 SEC winning % ain't bad for a new head man. For example, RT's 2 year runs before CH arrived are split dead even with 3 above and 3 below CH's .5932, with 2, count'em 2, ghastly 0.500 single year marks in 2 of the 3 years before CH arrived. Why we didn't fire RT then I'll never know. Crazy.
While the jury may still be out, there is pretty shabby evidence for a guilty verdict.