SportsSuites1 is the biggest joke of a poster. Please someone ban this guy.
Is Somebody Hurt At Clemson?
- Thread starter SportsSuites1
- Start date
"Only Wynn opened at -3.5"
Wynn, Stratosphere, and VI all opened at 3 to 3.5.
Stratosphere was at -3.5 VI at -3.
Are you incapable of posting factual non BS information?
Those are the 3 lines that opened on the 13th. All other lines opened at -6 +/- .5 range.
Wynn, Stratosphere, and VI all opened at 3 to 3.5.
Stratosphere was at -3.5 VI at -3.
Are you incapable of posting factual non BS information?
Those are the 3 lines that opened on the 13th. All other lines opened at -6 +/- .5 range.
"Sir Winston, you are DRUNK!"
"Yes, Lady Astor, and you are UGLY. The difference is that in the morning I will be sober."
Click on the PK under 'open' in column 1 and it'll take you to the line-movement page for all lines including time stamps, which shows 'consensus' open of -3 at 3:05 PM 9/13/15, with Wynn 'opening' about 2 hours later at -3.5.
You want to lay the points now or are you 'manly' enough to wait for post time? You said you'd 'bet' Louisville at +10 at what point do you show up for clemson? ... or do you know your way home?
SportsSuites1 It is Nortons "good " knee this time unfortunately. While you are right Jay G. is a bigger guy and probably doesn't whiff on hikes like Norton does Norton is much better at calling out protections thus the sacks last week up the middle after he left the game. That's why Norton starts.
He's a SC kid and I hope he gets well and can 'move on' if that's what he wants but doesn't 'figure' against USC.
.You can't win if you don't buy a ticket and all these guys that end up making NFL squads then at least have the 'chance' to go 'home' now and again and hopefully be good role models for the kids coming up behind them.
Pretty sure the only -10 in the screenshot you posted is the payout (shortened from the typical -110). Notice even the O/U says -10?
Anyway, everything i saw had the line opening at about Clemson -3.5 and has moved from there. Have fun arguing though.
Last week you had the whole Gamecock Nation betting on being 4-2 or 5-1 after 6 games. Not sure I can follow any more of your betting advice
No offense taken. IMHO, he has not shown us enough to be labeled awful or great, etc. the only thing we can gleam from his game experience is that he is not Watson.
You guys can argue all you want. The game opened as a pick em. I just found like 5 sites saying as much.
Only one arguing the asinine statement that the line has moved in UL's favor is the OP.
We won 10 games with our backup QB last year. We're also missing our top OL (Battle), our top DT, our top WR and our starter at NB. We have our own set of problems.
My opinion is that anyone that is betting on Louisville, is betting that Watson will get hurt. That's the only way that Louisville will win this game.
I don't give betting advice except to clemson people when we play 'em and that's bet on clemson ... the Q. that was asked (by someone else) was what did gamecocks think our record would be mid-season ... I replied probably 4-2, maybe 5-1 and while it'll be a tad harder after muffing last week that's still doable.
If you took that as 'advice' that's on you ... I'm thinking more like 4-2 now though but still believe 5-1 is doable.
Georgia wasn't terrific against Vandy - they could have very easily lost that game - like us against UNC their D won the ballgame ... it wasn't Chubb, et al.
Similar threads
