ADVERTISEMENT

Just a point, womens NCAA field needs reduced or something

uscusc1987

Active Member
May 30, 2008
1,403
1,108
113
Teams getting beat by 60, 70 ,snd 80 plus points the first weekend. That's ridiculous and making te NCAA tourney and losing by 60 plus does nothing to help your program.
 
Was mostly the #1 seeds that won by that much. The women had 7 in the 30+ range. The men's bracket had 4 teams that won in the first round by 20+.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CoachT13
Teams getting beat by 60, 70 ,snd 80 plus points the first weekend. That's ridiculous and making te NCAA tourney and losing by 60 plus does nothing to help your program.

I agree with your post but you will never hear the coaches complain as 64 coaches can say they took their team to the post season and now 32 can say they won a game. Job security. Same principles apply to the saturated football bowl season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: king ward
I agree with your post but you will never hear the coaches complain as 64 coaches can say they took their team to the post season and now 32 can say they won a game. Job security. Same principles apply to the saturated football bowl season.
Bowls definitely need to be reduced, but you're right, it will never happen.
 
It's a product of a smaller talent pool for womens basketball. The top-notch talent is concentrated in a relative handful of programs. There's a huge talent gap between the typical top 10 team and the typical 11 - 25 team. You could pare the women's tournament down to 16 teams and you'd still have several without a prayer of winning the thing. But, as said above, will never happen.
 
It's a product of a smaller talent pool for womens basketball. The top-notch talent is concentrated in a relative handful of programs. There's a huge talent gap between the typical top 10 team and the typical 11 - 25 team. You could pare the women's tournament down to 16 teams and you'd still have several without a prayer of winning the thing. But, as said above, will never happen.

Well, dammit, something needs to change . . . um . . . no . . . heh-heh . . . WE are part of the 'problem'
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT