Muschamp back on the field
- Thread starter SparkleCity
- Start date
So you are saying
“He was the special teams coach in waiting “
ba doom tish!!!
You got to go way back to understand and get a laugh out of that one
“He was the special teams coach in waiting “
ba doom tish!!!
You got to go way back to understand and get a laugh out of that one
If Smart is smart, he won't give him much input or latitude, at least not enough to hurt the team
Keep him actively involved...it improves every single teams chances of beating Georgia.
Not every assistant coach can handle the head coaching job. Muschamp was a good defensive coordinator. Head coaching duties are beyond his capabilities. He failed miserably twice.
Exactly my opinion. He's good when he's laser focused on one thing. Being the head guy (whether that's a coach, CEO, etc.) you can't be laser focused, you have to hire people that are and leave them alone. He just couldn't do it for one reason or another, he had to be involved in everything, which meant mediocre at everything. Also, the man liked to hire his buddies, people that thought like him. A differing opinion is healthy. Even if you get the final say, you still want people that are going to challenge your thought process. He always tried to come across as the smartest guy in the room (and also a smartass). That's all fine and good if you're producing/winning, but it gets old real quick when you're not winning and still think you're a genius.
I've never understood this mentality. Ad the head coach he didn't focus on any one area. His defenses weren't spectacular either, but he was working on the whole team, not one group or another. You can't really judge a head coach by how a specific position or group performed.
Agree. Believe he is one of those who simply can't see the forest for the trees.
Guess they thought as much of his analytical skills as we did. Not sure what they are seeing in him when it comes to special teams.
I don't care where he is, as long as he isn't here.
I don't care where he is, as long as he isn't here.
I can see him being very successful in a coordinator role. Good luck to him.
True. For every time Muschamp would say “gap control”, Saban would say “process”.
I hope Georgia promotes him to offensive coordinator. He could do great things for Georgia in that role.
Under Muschamp offense, defense nor special teams were good. They were all equally bad under his leadership.
That makes me want to put a $1000 on clemmy against UGA🤣
... I get that. Did you read my post? He may be a good defensive coach or a good special teams coach. How those units faired under him as a head coach is not an accurate barometer of his ability to coach those players.
He may be a terrible ST coach. Who knows? I was only saying that because of lack of focus on any one facet or group in a HC position, the performance of those units is not going to be an accurate representation of his ability to coach them specifically. For Spurrier being his own OC, things were a little different. We didn't say he'd be a great defensive coach because we had one of the best defenses in the country when he was here, though.
Yeah I read it and agree with what you said. My point was he seemed to meddle more in the offense than he did defense which was his specialty. I never understood that.
So Muschamp is coaching the special teams? And our new coach's last name is Beamer ??????hmmmmmm
Micromanagers gotta micromanage. They can't help themselves. I used to work for one company owner who thought he was supposed to tell every person in the business how to do their jobs. He wasn't the most successful.
But as a former DC you would expect to at least have a decent defense. Saban was a DC and all his teams had good to great defenses.
There is a long list of good defensive coordinators who fail as head coaches.
Latest posts
-
-
Gamecock Scoop Podcast: NFL Draft Reaction and Baseball Breaks Through- Latest: Caleb Alexander
-
Gamecock Scoop Podcast: NFL Draft Reaction and Baseball Breaks Through
- Latest: Caleb Alexander
-
