ADVERTISEMENT

OT: Fauci: Chances of CV Vaccine Being Highly Effective is "Not Great"

Status
Not open for further replies.

Thirdcatgy

Member
Sep 12, 2004
815
681
93
Hmmm.....HCQ (approved in US in 1955) was proven to reduce death by around 50% even when given in later stages in the new Henry Ford study of 2500+ patients.

Now here we are a largely unproven vaccine that they are fast-tracking which will likely cost thousands per patient - and they are hopeful for at least a 50% response. And because it's altering DNA, it will likely take years to determine the complete impact of side effects.

In addition, because of the Bayh-Dole Act, Fauci stands to profit from the Gates vaccine.

-----------------------------------------

KEY POINTS
  • White House coronavirus advisor Dr. Anthony Fauci that the chances of scientists creating a highly effective vaccine — one that provides 98% or more guaranteed protection — for the virus are slim.
  • Scientists are hoping for a coronavirus vaccine that is at least 75% effective, but 50% or 60% effective would be acceptable, too, he said.
  • The FDA has said it would authorize a coronavirus vaccine so long as it is safe and at least 50% effective.

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/08/07/cor...f-it-being-highly-effective-is-not-great.html
 
Hmmm.....HCQ (approved in US in 1955) was proven to reduce death by around 50% even when given in later stages in the new Henry Ford study of 2500+ patients.

Now here we are a largely unproven vaccine that they are fast-tracking which will likely cost thousands per patient - and they are hopeful for at least a 50% response. And because it's altering DNA, it will likely take years to determine the complete impact of side effects.

In addition, because of the Bayh-Dole Act, Fauci stands to profit from the Gates vaccine.

-----------------------------------------

KEY POINTS
  • White House coronavirus advisor Dr. Anthony Fauci that the chances of scientists creating a highly effective vaccine — one that provides 98% or more guaranteed protection — for the virus are slim.
  • Scientists are hoping for a coronavirus vaccine that is at least 75% effective, but 50% or 60% effective would be acceptable, too, he said.
  • The FDA has said it would authorize a coronavirus vaccine so long as it is safe and at least 50% effective.

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/08/07/cor...f-it-being-highly-effective-is-not-great.html

Fire Calvi!
 
If you still get COVID after getting the vaccine it can still lessen the effects. Same with a flu shot which is also a no-brainer.
 
I'm tired of Fauci. He has had an opinion to cover his tail in any eventuality. Also tired of politicians, now drunk with the power of control, setting rules. Can't go to church, or eat within 20 feet of someone. But its fine to pack as many folks as Wal Mart, Lowes, and the grocery store can get in the door. If you want to live in the basement, fine. Stay there. For the rest of us, time to ignore what they say and do what we want. If they try to shut you down, just tell them that you are protesting. That seems to be a magic activity where this bug doesn't spread.
 
I worked in the therapeutic biological and vaccine regulatory industry for years. I’ve dealt with plenty of folks at the FDA. Fauci is the typical government scientist bureaucrat. Smart guy, able to play both sides of an issue and come out safe no matter the outcome. I suspect we will have a vaccine that ends up making Covid 19 like influenza. Something that is manageable but still a serious issue for high risk people. That will be enough.
 
Hmmm.....HCQ (approved in US in 1955) was proven to reduce death by around 50% even when given in later stages in the new Henry Ford study of 2500+ patients.

Now here we are a largely unproven vaccine that they are fast-tracking which will likely cost thousands per patient - and they are hopeful for at least a 50% response. And because it's altering DNA, it will likely take years to determine the complete impact of side effects.

In addition, because of the Bayh-Dole Act, Fauci stands to profit from the Gates vaccine.

-----------------------------------------

KEY POINTS
  • White House coronavirus advisor Dr. Anthony Fauci that the chances of scientists creating a highly effective vaccine — one that provides 98% or more guaranteed protection — for the virus are slim.
  • Scientists are hoping for a coronavirus vaccine that is at least 75% effective, but 50% or 60% effective would be acceptable, too, he said.
  • The FDA has said it would authorize a coronavirus vaccine so long as it is safe and at least 50% effective.

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/08/07/cor...f-it-being-highly-effective-is-not-great.html
This guy takes precaution to make sure no matter what he says he can say he was right. Notice that? He's useless and feeds right in to every negative narrative.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Thirdcatgy
neurofibrillary tangles and amyloid plaques...and maybe some tau proteins for good measure.

After watching him "throw" a baseball, it appears that he is trying to stay relevant.

But...I think one of our leading vaccines causes some significant marrow depression early on, even though it seems to result in short term immunity.

I am still betting on Oxford and EIDD-2801.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Thirdcatgy
Status
Not open for further replies.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT