Agree or disagree on the ranking?
http://athlonsports.com/college-football/ranking-secs-2015-football-uniforms#3
http://athlonsports.com/college-football/ranking-secs-2015-football-uniforms#3
Just win and no one will care what we look like...
Except the players...and they are the only ones that matter. It's a big deal to them but our staff knows this and they have people that help them with it.
Fans have a right to discuss it, but no say so whatsoever in what the team wears.
And now...I'm awaiting the Helmet thread. I'm sure the facemask are horrid, no matter how many bars and the block C is either too small or too large...or is it that the Gamecock logo is too small or too large???
I think the players really don't care what the uniforms look like as long as they are wearing them for highlight reals of winning games..
I agree. I like the clean look of no stripes, names, etc. I guess that's why I like the all white Unis the best.Agree or disagree on the ranking?
http://athlonsports.com/college-football/ranking-secs-2015-football-uniforms#3
I guess the writer didn't list all the teams because he didn't want to draw the wrath of Mizzou fans by ranking them last. Their white uniforms aren't so bad, but that black and gold combination looks like a left over XFL uniform.
The uniforms are the best in a while but still not great. "Carolina" is too small and so are the numbers. Nothing about the design is sustainable. I fully expect to see changes in the near future.
I'm not sure why we can't do something like this:
http://boards.sportslogos.net/topic/83905-south-carolina-gamecocks-football-concepts/
And for the tough guys who don't like talking about or understand why people discuss jerseys- get over it.
Mizzou was ranked 14th out of 14 teams.