ADVERTISEMENT

Stadium Capacity in lower 1/2 SEC -

usc5930

Member
Jan 23, 2019
93
76
18
TeamStadiumCapacity
Texas A&MKyle Field102,733
TennesseeNeyland Stadium102,455
LSUTiger Stadium102,321
AlabamaBryant-Denny Stadium101,821
GeorgiaSanford Stadium92,746
FloridaBen Hill Griffin Stadium88,548
AuburnJordan-Hare Stadium87,451
South CarolinaWilliams-Brice Stadium80,250
ArkansasRazorback Stadium76,212
Ole MissVaught-Hemingway Stadium64,038
MissouriMemorial Stadium62,621
Miss StateDavis Wade Stadium61,337
KentuckyKroger Field61,000
VanderbiltVanderbilt Stadium40,550
 
Good. It should be. In fact, 80,000 is too large for the vast majority of games. With every game televised, the days of massive stadium additions are over.
Yep. Heck, even with “sellouts” the stadium often isn’t full-full.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lakecock1
TeamStadiumCapacity
Texas A&MKyle Field102,733
TennesseeNeyland Stadium102,455
LSUTiger Stadium102,321
AlabamaBryant-Denny Stadium101,821
GeorgiaSanford Stadium92,746
FloridaBen Hill Griffin Stadium88,548
AuburnJordan-Hare Stadium87,451
South CarolinaWilliams-Brice Stadium80,250
ArkansasRazorback Stadium76,212
Ole MissVaught-Hemingway Stadium64,038
MissouriMemorial Stadium62,621
Miss StateDavis Wade Stadium61,337
KentuckyKroger Field61,000
VanderbiltVanderbilt Stadium40,550
Think Fenway, wrigley……..bigger is not always better.
 
Think Fenway, wrigley……..bigger is not always better.
Yeah, use Duke basketball for example. It only holds 9,000 people so they got this huge claim to Fame about always being sold out. Hell Carolina women's and men teams normally avg more pol than Duke's teams. That's even with us just being a middle of road teams.
 
No one would buy those seats. It would just look emptier than it does now.
If this program gets rolling everybody knows it’ll be full - you have no control over where a teenager goes to play ball, but facilities are a controlled variable and necessity -
 
We are in company of some rich folks
We are a couple thousand lower now and we still have more seats than we need. Anything we do from here on out ought to be about better, not bigger. The demand curve has been shifted by rising cost and diminished product. We have some well-heeled fans who can pay anything, but by and large, our fanbase is not prosperous and won't sacrifice to support mediocrity when HDTV is everywhere.
 
If this program gets rolling everybody knows it’ll be full - you have no control over where a teenager goes to play ball, but facilities are a controlled variable and necessity -

Attendance trends across both pro and college sports have been pointing down for several years.

We don't need more seats. People are looking for more comfort, convenience and amenities in the live sports experience.
 
The baseball model tells the story from a long term perspective. Make it smaller, nicer. Realize the TV /streaming appeal has and will reduce capacity.

And add this...the available sports dollar is better used to fund NIL and not fill seats. Schools are actually motivated to do this passively by reducing seats. Fans may find it more satisfying on many levels. The players can play with no fans and more money in the pocket. Only the richest, established power teams will support monstrosities.
 
We had WB swaying with Joe Morrison. And the capacity at that time was around 72,400. In the day of large screen HD TV, and nearly every game broadcast, I don’t see the need to think expansion is wanted or needed.
 
Tennessee's stadium is a dump. It should seat about 75,000 because the seats are so small. UK reduced the size of seating and I think really made it comfortable to watch games.

Many of the stadiums with lots of seats are the same size as ones with less. They just squeeze more people in.

I wish they would list stadiums by square footage instead.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT