That’s a crock. 4 wins max. He couldn’t ever make 2nd half adjustments and rarely came from behind to win.Because deep down people know we would have been 7-5 or 8-4 with Muschamp this year
an asset, but the players, like recruiting first year players have to want to come here. Last year not many wanted to come here. Hopefully, we can get some frontline talent. We desperately need a QB and some recievers.Some of you think getting great players from the portal is like filling a shopping cart at Publix. It isn’t that easy.
Guys go into the portal for different reasons. Some aren’t good enough to play where they’re at, some are clubhouse cancers, some are late developers and some are good to play at most places but are stuck behind a very good player.
The latter two are what we want, and they’re in high demand.
Some people bitch about who we got from the portal last time, but the vast majority contributed. I think CSB and the staff did a pretty good job filling needs.
The flip side, I don’t think the guys we lost to the portal really shined where they went.
CSB needs to mine the portal carefully, getting good players with the right attitude who can be coached up.
i just hope we kept the guy that changed Kinlaw's body.Muschamp’s problem was not recruiting. Player development and coaching were his primary problems.
Not only that, but we didn't do any better rushing against Mizzou or Kentucky, so it's not just that clemsux was exceptionally good. We just have a terrible OL, which is puzzling since it is virtually the same line that gave us the leading rusher in the SEC last year. What is different? Could it be coaching and schemes?You can frame it any way you want, our OL is weak, our players looked slow and our schemes are garbage. They had their way with us better than they did against all of their acc opponents, that speaks volumes!
Because deep down people know we would have been 7-5 or 8-4 with Muschamp this year
Because deep down people know we would have been 7-5 or 8-4 with Muschamp this year
Those don't have to be mutually exclusive.😉Not only that, but we didn't do any better rushing against Mizzou or Kentucky, so it's not just that clemsux was exceptionally good. We just have a terrible OL, which is puzzling since it is virtually the same line that gave us the leading rusher in the SEC last year. What is different? Could it be coaching and schemes?
Some problems was recruiting as well. After Josh Vann we stop recruiting good WRs. We went after bad players in recruiting and let nfl players slip through our hands.Muschamp’s problem was not recruiting. Player development and coaching were his primary problems.
So, you’re the only one who thinks Muschamp would have a better record this year.
I disagree. IMHO we wouldn’t be bowl eligible with Muschamp.
I don’t think we were well coached this year, but I think we were better coached than the last couple years of Muschamp.
And at Linebacker.Some problems was recruiting as well. After Josh Vann we stop recruiting good WRs. We went after bad players in recruiting and let nfl players slip through our hands.
Really everywhere. I think we did a good job at RB and OL recently. But that’s about it.And at Linebacker.