Gorget, Cresent, moon, call it whatever, doesn't change the fact we got the best flag in the states. Now, about that new rendition of the palmetto, looks like it was drawn right after Hugo landed........js
Thanks for that article! Additional info I didn't know about.Not a crescent, its a gorget on the Bull's coat of arms. I think William Bull was the first SC Lt Governor as an english colony and the soldiers wore the the Bull's gorget on their head gear. whatever you want to call it.
![]()
![]()
However, the "crescent" from the Bull coat of arms IS a gorget.Thanks for that article! Additional info I didn't know about.
Did you actually read the article? It specifically makes the point that it was a crescent from the Bull coat of arms and NOT a gorget.
The article specifically says the crescent on the Bull coat of arms is the source of crescent and not sourced from a gorget.However, the "crescent" from the Bull coat of arms IS a gorget.
Ok, so the Bull family crest as the source of the "crescent" in the flag can be disputed, because as you say it's not a gorget.The article specifically says the crescent on the Bull coat of arms is the source of crescent and not sourced from a gorget.
The crescent on the arms is not in the shape of a gorget, as that shape in the arms could never fit around a throat as neck and upper chest protector. The appropriately drawn armored arm and sword belies any attempt at drawing a recognizable gorget. A crescent (on an arms) is the first, and most oftened used, indication of cadency of a junior branch recognized by the College of Arms. Typically placed in the Chief, or Dexter position. Like the current palmetto tree situation, there is no standard crescent, pointed up, pointed down, leaning left, or leaning right. Skinny or fat. Tips touching, or broadly placed apart. All are acceptable.
Heraldry doesn't use the word "gorget" to describe an individual element in an arms. The closest use would be a drawing of a "helmet that is gorged".
So no, it's not a gorget. The article linked is correct in that it is crescent on an arms. A heraldry element for cadency, not a gorget.
Thanks for that article! Additional info I didn't know about.
Did you actually read the article? It specifically makes the point that it was a crescent from the Bull coat of arms and NOT a gorget.
However, the "crescent" from the Bull coat of arms IS a gorget.
Yes, that's a ceremonial gorget. Used for special events and ceremony, not for combat. I referenced George Washington wearing one in an earlier post. As the picture shows, it hangs by a chain from around the neck (even tips for balance).Ok, so the Bull family crest as the source of the "crescent" in the flag can be disputed, because as you say it's not a gorget.
![]()
Here's a painting of George Washington wearing one,
![]()
Sorry to go off on a tangent, but I thought a crescent in heraldry indicated involvement in one of the Crusades?Yes, that's a ceremonial gorget. Used for special events and ceremony, not for combat. I referenced George Washington wearing one in an earlier post. As the picture shows, it hangs by a chain from around the neck (even tips for balance).
Assuming the article, that was linked above, is correct, the Bull arms were used as the inspiration. Those arms are medieval by their simplistic design (not quartered) and using actual armor and sword design of the period. If a gorget had been used, it would be a real gorget, not ceremonial. There would be a blade catch to protect the throat, if not affixed directly to the helmut. One side of the crescent would typically be a different shape than the other to free up and accomodate the swing of the sword arm.
A ceremonial gorget may have been the actual inspiration if one wishes to refute the account given in the linked article (not my link). I merely pointed out the article specifically implies it is not a gorget, right or wrong.
Sorry to go off on a tangent, but I thought a crescent in heraldry indicated involvement in one of the Crusades?
Not the crescent.Sorry to go off on a tangent, but I thought a crescent in heraldry indicated involvement in one of the Crusades?
I concur on visiting Fort Moultrie, fascinating place and view. However, be wary of what the guide tells you. The National Park Service in particular often "revises" their history to fit the whims of the current administration.I highly recommend a tour of Fort Moultrie where the National Park Service guide will be eager to explain that the crescent on our flag is indeed a gorget. You may get an even better explanation on a guided tour of our State House when they resume operations. One of the PRT guides there often wears a gorget during the tours.
I concur on visiting Fort Moultrie, fascinating place and view. However, be wary of what the guide tells you. The National Park Service in particular often "revises" their history to fit the whims of the current administration.
I highly recommend the opinion of a college history professor that has actually studied history.
The pointing straight up crescent from the Bull coat of arms was tilted to the left by Moultrie to mimick the moon. This has been a very common alteration to arms for centuries, often in conjunction with a rampant animal (typically a lion) reaching up to claw the "moon".The Moutrie Flag's gorget looks less like a moon. After the palmetto logs used in the fort withstood the cannonballs and helped defeat the British is easy to see how its image was added to this flag.
![]()
Looks like a toilet brush.There were several versions to pick from and some more historic than this one. Why they picked the one with ugliest fronds is beyond me.
The pointing straight up crescent from the Bull coat of arms was tilted to the left by Moultrie to mimick the moon. This has been a very common alteration to arms for centuries, often in conjunction with a rampant animal (typically a lion) reaching up to claw the "moon".
Modern iterations of the state flag have taken the tilted herald crescent in the Dexter position and moved it closer to the tree and transformed it into a crescent moon over the tree, ala the car window stickers.
Not directly to this branch, however, I had family on Barbados that were neighbors and close associates to the Bulls as fellow colonists waiting to establish Charleston Colony under Lord Ashley-Cooper in 1670.Are you a Bull descendant?
Sounds like a Monty Python skit! 😁The original gorget was useful in battle. It was even more useful in the kitchen as a metallic bib. Soups can get messy!
I am also indirectly related to Bulls. My branch landed around the Georgetown, Myrtle beach area 300+ years agoNot directly to this branch, however, I had family on Barbados that were neighbors and close associates to the Bulls as fellow colonists waiting to establish Charleston Colony under Lord Ashley-Cooper in 1670.
Same here, another family line owned part of Georgetown before the town was subdivided into lots in 1735. That line is married into the Middletons, Izards, Horrys, Rutledges, Pinckneys, and Singletons, same as the Bulls in this thread are.I am also indirectly related to Bulls. My branch landed around the Georgetown, Myrtle beach area 300+ years ago
[/QUOTE]Actually the concept artist was Ellen Heyward Jervey from Charleston. She drew it in 1910. She has not as yet filed for compensation...
![]()