Not if our team doesn't commit themselves to getting better. We are the same team that we were in November. No improvement in ball movement or shot selection. Our team needs to watch every aspect of this game over and over again.Originally posted by jeff2001:
Nm
They simply outscored them. Also, they played at Stanford and UConn had some problems playing there.Originally posted by Cocky kebo57:
The only problem is that UCONN will play better on a neutral court too. How on earth did Stanford ever beat this team??
I didn't say we would win. LolOriginally posted by Judson1:
Too much credit given to a neutral court IMO. They have by far the best shooter, the best post player, and the best guard. We are getting there but tonight was an even larger eye opener than I anticipated.
UConn CANNOT play any better than they did.Originally posted by Cocky kebo57:
The only problem is that UCONN will play better on a neutral court too. How on earth did Stanford ever beat this team??
Pretty much this. Problem is, that is about as good as we play. I said a few weeks ago, if our girls don't improve, they won't make the Final Four.Originally posted by gamecokpride:
UConn CANNOT play any better than they did.Originally posted by Cocky kebo57:
The only problem is that UCONN will play better on a neutral court too. How on earth did Stanford ever beat this team??
That was their A++ game.
In a word (I'll render a guess) - height. Last time we played Stanford they looked like they had 3-4 mascots on the court playing for them - Sequoah trees.Originally posted by Cocky kebo57:
The only problem is that UCONN will play better on a neutral court too. How on earth did Stanford ever beat this team??
do not agree with this assessmentOriginally posted by uscbeckham:
Pretty much this. Problem is, that is about as good as we play. I said a few weeks ago, if our girls don't improve, they won't make the Final Four.Originally posted by gamecokpride:
UConn CANNOT play any better than they did.Originally posted by Cocky kebo57:
The only problem is that UCONN will play better on a neutral court too. How on earth did Stanford ever beat this team??
That was their A++ game.
Now is the chance. They finally found the team that could expose every weakness. Now, they need to go fix it.
When? Even when we blow someone out, we turn the ball over and have terrible ball movement. We have won a lot of games on athleticism. It's time that we start getting better at team basketball.Originally posted by chucktowncock:
do not agree with this assessmentOriginally posted by uscbeckham:
Pretty much this. Problem is, that is about as good as we play. I said a few weeks ago, if our girls don't improve, they won't make the Final Four.Originally posted by gamecokpride:
UConn CANNOT play any better than they did.Originally posted by Cocky kebo57:
The only problem is that UCONN will play better on a neutral court too. How on earth did Stanford ever beat this team??
That was their A++ game.
Now is the chance. They finally found the team that could expose every weakness. Now, they need to go fix it.
we can and have played much better
That may be a true statement, but from here on out we need to play MUCH better EVERY game, and we don't always do that. Our shooting is streaky and we tend to come out cold sometimes. Defense tends to leave the back door open too much. I'm guessing every team from here on out will try to face guard Mitchell all they can. Hey, it worked for UConn.Originally posted by chucktowncock:
do not agree with this assessmentOriginally posted by uscbeckham:
Pretty much this. Problem is, that is about as good as we play. I said a few weeks ago, if our girls don't improve, they won't make the Final Four.Originally posted by gamecokpride:
UConn CANNOT play any better than they did.Originally posted by Cocky kebo57:
The only problem is that UCONN will play better on a neutral court too. How on earth did Stanford ever beat this team??
That was their A++ game.
Now is the chance. They finally found the team that could expose every weakness. Now, they need to go fix it.
we can and have played much better
Problem is that UConn moves the ball and shoots so well that it would shred a zone defense even worse. Also, a zone is terrible for box-out responsibility. They would murder us on the boards.Originally posted by bdblack:
When you man a low post player who is the best in the nation with a girl 5" shorter, why be surprised when everything they throw up goes in. Why not zone and take a chance on the three ball? That's better than 30+ points given up four feet from the basket.
FWIW, they shot 73% from 3pt range, but only 51% from everywhere else. Tonight, they were going to hit shots. Playing zone probably would've made it worse.Originally posted by bdblack:
I'd rather take a chance with shredding my defense from 20 feet that a sure thing from 4 feet. Zones are played to protect the lane and to facilitate defensive rebounding if you have height. Unfortunately, we don't box-out in a man either.
The two major ones were #23 throwing the elbow before the 3 and Stewart getting the charge call. That was pretty bad.Originally posted by Garnet chicken:
It would not have made a difference in the out come of the game, but there was a lot of home cooking. Their bigs got away with fouls, Cuevas called for a charge with Stewart moving all the time. Cuevas called for a foul on a clean block. U Conn's #23 throwing an elbow and pushing off and then canning a 3. These are the things that can swing a game quickly, especially when every shot they throw up goes in. If they play again, they better stick those gunners outside and body up Stewart underneath. They do not need to play half court, they should have run it out with them cause it stopped our offense cold.
This post was edited on 2/9 10:31 PM by Garnet chicken