This is completely inaccurate. Phil Steele's magazine had USC finishing ahead of Tennessee but I don't remember much else. The Vegas over under for this team was 3.5: Eastern Illinois, Troy and Vanderbilt with East Carolina as a toss up.
No he didn’t. He didn’t help....but there is talent on defense and Beamer and staff been on the job the same amount of time heupel and crew have. Today You saw the difference between a guy who earned the chance to take a job of this significance and a guy who received the opportunity to take a job of this significance because of his last name.
Yep, that is the reaction that our playOur fanbase
Shane Smith isn't walking our sideline. Even Frank Beamer is head in hands right now.
Why don’t we? Heupel been there for 2 years now or what? Does the transfer portal not work at Carolina where you can literally walk in and challenge for starting positions immediately at any position? Pretty nice selling point.
Or maybe some of the fgf posters could help hire an adequate coach? Some of us do that every day in life...make decisions, hire competent people, hold them accountable.
247sports.com
I've seen the list. I knew they definitely lost some good ones so my post was inaccurate. However, they got a good QB and few good defensive transfers in this year (Texas and Southern Cal). So, as much as your are correct to misinterpret my unartful post, I still think they have more talent than USC on the front 22. Although, they are starting to drop like flies.Phil Steele aside, I was speaking about posters on this board.
Also, they didn't lose worthless players. I've posted this a couple times.
College football teams who were crushed by transfer portal losses this offseason
Once in the early days of the transfer portal, the University of Missouri-Kansas City’s basketball team saw 11 of its 13 scholarship players enter the transfer portal
Beamer NEVER got a job because of his last name. That is an out and out LIE.
All of the ones that involved him being a coach.
And you think 20 years in coaching means nothing? He got hired to recreate the Spurrier magic. Give it a few years.
Hardly. Most everyone knew we would struggle to win more than 3 or 4 games. What we were hoping for was to see a steady improvement as the season went on and a disciplined, well-coached team. We're seeing NONE of that right now.
Sure it can. Ask any of the coaches who hired him if that played a role. The only possible one would be UT as a graduate assistant. Every other job he earned by the results on the field.
The first hire sure, but after that no coach is going to hire based on a name if you can’t produce. Every single coach had nothing but praise for Beamer so logic indicates he was hired based on ability.
Haha you think Beamer is Spurrier reincarnate? Did you really just say that..
Good head coach material, which Wing certainly believes Shane is, don’t usually piddle in position coach land for 20 years. He is talking out of both sides of his mouth, on one hand he says every coach praised him as a position coach but on the other no one was willing to take a chance on him as the head man over those 20 years except us. Speaks volumes!
Did you say the Spurrier magic? You might know something we don’t. When? BTW thanks in advance for the enlightenment. You certainly know more than most.
