Change your handle to pussywillow or something more appropriate.
Is Feaster coming here
- Thread starter jonesz21
- Start date
Exactly. You only get 4 years of eligibility. Where does he think all these grad transfers are getting this extra year of eligibility from? From a team standpoint they will be seniors but from an academic standpoint they have already graduated. It really is that simple.
It’s a spread. Not terribly different from what Clemson runs. Basic concepts transfer. Ours are probably more basic.
From what play I've seen, he has great speed, good vision, good blocking skills, and very good hands coming out of the backfield. Average power and ability to break tackles. Basically, if you give him a hole, he can find it and take it to the house.
Accurate assessment. His long run on a screen play in the CFP championship was a good example of his abilities.
No, please tell me where to look for it. I'd really like to see it.
Ha. Not looking for nor do we need a savior, my friend. Just need enough of a running game to give the gamecock qb experts something else to pontificate on.
"I'll take jeez are you really that stupid for 500."
The answer is "these three hof qbs among others had a 1:1 td to interception ratio for their careers."
"Who are Joe Namath, Terry Bradshaw, and Brett Farve."
Ding.
Definitely our most complete back. He has the individual strengths of the other backs in one back. So, yeah more than likely.
Well, I'll take $1,000 "are you really that stupid" and I think you are, so it's a sure bet - who gives a damn about those players relative to this discussion. We are talking about Gamecock football not NFL football. There is a huge difference.
Good vision....finds the crease. Has a good sense of where the first down is and always falls forward. And is a bit better at breaking tackles than I remembered. I hope we get him...he would immediately improve our running game.
https://video.search.yahoo.com/yhs/...=93e7cad43b29ac1282b7028311fb2d16&action=view
https://video.search.yahoo.com/yhs/...=9555aa64f0e31d28fb2b3b9292b7eadf&action=view
I'm not denying any of his abilities, okay. I'm just wondering once he gets here (if he indeed does come) how long will it take him to learn our system, coordination with his team members relative to plays, etc. Remember if he comes, it will be late August before he arrives on campus.
What most of the fan qb experts (and you're apparently one of them) are doing is neither talking gamecock football nor nfl football; its complaining about and/or criticizing Bentley when you can leave Muschamp alone for a few moments. However, in the context of overall qb accomplishment, please articulate the huge difference you refer to.
Texas went through the same thing last year with Tre Watson. He was a Cal graduate and committed in May, so he had a few more months to adjust, but no spring training. Watson was a significant positive factor for Texas, getting 786 yards for Texas and basically sharing rb duties. He caught 22 passes as well. Watson got 91 yards against Georgia in the bowl game. So Watson got a late start, but was a crucial component of the offense very quickly. I doubt Feaster would take more than a month of practices to be well integrated. At the very least he would be 100% for Kentucky, Georgia, Florida, Tenn, A&M and Clemson. That sounds worthwile to me.
If Clemson didnt have a top Heismann candidate at his position, he would have been putting up MONSTER numbers there.
Already led them in yards per carry last year.
Would instantly be the best RB on our roster, and a great bridge to Lloyd & hopefully Tank come in the year after.
Already led them in yards per carry last year.
Would instantly be the best RB on our roster, and a great bridge to Lloyd & hopefully Tank come in the year after.
He would start from day one. I’ll take him as a hired gun for a year. Even if he was a tater.
First of all find a post where I criticized Bentley or Muschamp. Secondly, do you really need me to articulate the difference- because if you need me to do that then I'm not sure I can be of help to you.
