I know i will catch hell, But i think Shula is a good Hire... We will see..
I'd like to think he's the best OC hire Beamer has made.
I know i will catch hell, But i think Shula is a good Hire... We will see..
He is! These same people bitching are the same ones who hated Loggains. IMO, a good OC is one who listens to all coaches.I'd like to think he's the best OC hire Beamer has made.
He is! These same people bitching are the same ones who hated Loggains. IMO, a good OC is one who listens to all coaches.
We're screwed......apparently Beamer hired Mike Shula because "he wanted to be here". The new AD also wants to "be here".These same people bitching are the same ones who hated Loggains.
We need a good offensive analyst on the sideline to help the QBs.Shula is a good move because it's someone that offensive players clearly know and seem comfortable with- and it's good to get this done so quickly.
I also feel pretty confident in saying this is what Sellers and the QB room wanted to some degree.
Word is that Loggains wanted him as OC at APP State.
Now that Shula has the job. I would hope Shane and Mike reach out to another offensive analyst to fill in for Shula's role- someone Mike trusts and knows- maybe from the NFL. They might want to wait until after the NFL season though to hire someone from there. So this might take a bit unless he already has someone in mind from the college ranks.
This might sound crazy- but what is Frank Reich doing? Might be worth Shane calling and asking if he wanted to help out offensively.
I'd like to think he's the best OC hire Beamer has made.
Shula is here because of Loggains. That was the connection. Otherwise, he's not here.This hire would have gone over a lot better had Shula been hired two years ago instead of Loggains.
Unfortunately, it looks like a lazy hire after the hype we had this offseason and knowing the asset we have in Sellers.
Shula is here because of Loggains. That was the connection. Otherwise, he's not here.
This hire would have gone over a lot better had Shula been hired two years ago instead of Loggains.
Unfortunately, it looks like a lazy hire after the hype we had this offseason and knowing the asset we have in Sellers.
Any South Carolina coaching job is fraught with risk. Not any more so than other schools but it has a reputation as a dead end for any and all coaches.So you're saying Beamer is struggling to attract talented OCs on his own?
So you're saying Beamer is struggling to attract talented OCs on his own?
Any South Carolina coaching job is fraught with risk. Not any more so than other schools but it has a reputation as a dead end for any and all coaches.
I said Mike Shula first came to South Carolina because of a connection to Loggains.
Coaches often hire coaches they have a connection to in some fashion (either themselves or through a trusted assistant) or know well. That was the case with Beamer and Loggains. That's the case with Loggains and Shula.
Many experienced coaches prefer having a connection of some type to a coach or program.
It turns out, Shula jumped to an analyst role for a coach he did have a connection with in Loggains.
There is now a connection with case Beamer and Shula.
Routine.
The "lazy hire" was clearly by our military.
It's a shame you don't actually make enough money to pay taxes so I could thank you for your support.
Just make sure you get us that 2025 Thesis by EOY.
You're always on the razor's edge of foresight.
You're saying a lot of words without much substance.
Let us know when you and @GoCocksFight2021 are willing to make predictions.
You're saying a lot of words without much substance.
Let us know when you and @GoCocksFight2021 are willing to make predictions.