and more involved in the offense this year than many know.
Sounds like something a poster I know would call a conspiracy theory and post a bunch of lame memes about.
and more involved in the offense this year than many know.
Why not promote the guy who was head coach at Georgia State and resigned to rejoin our staff this year? I forget his name but he’s an outstanding coach. He was the interim Head coach for us when Spurrier quit mid year.
Why not promote the guy who was head coach at Georgia State and resigned to rejoin our staff this year? I forget his name but he’s an outstanding coach. He was the interim Head coach for us when Spurrier quit mid year.
And Elliott's involvement in the offense beyond just the run game coordinator and tight ends coach didn't come from me. It was discussed on the 107.5 morning show at length earlier in the season. Those guys usually have a little more insight than your normal message board poster.
Just because you were a head coach somewhere else doesn't mean you are a good OC. In my opinion OC are a different breed.
Agreed. The big question for the OC options will be if they run an offense that Beamer wants.
To me, that means "pro style".
Which is dumb considering Sellers limitations in the passing game.
We need an OC who can maximize what Sellers is great at.
Shawn Elliott's increased involved was discussed before the season even started. And he's already stated that he will be involved with the OL too, even though he's not the OL coach.
Not some half-baked nutjob conspiracy theory in the middle of the season because of some deranged, irrational hatred by howling monkeys that couldn't stand the success seen on the field.
Shawn Elliott's increased involved was discussed before the season even started. And he's already stated that he will be involved with the OL too, even though he's not the OL coach.
Not some half-baked nutjob conspiracy theory in the middle of the season because of some deranged, irrational hatred by howling monkeys that couldn't stand the success seen on the field.
Sellers knows how to run.
He's shown over and over again he can pull Hoondi acts when plays break down.
Both he and the staff are interested in further developing his passing game at this point to create a deadly dual-threat.
If we keep running him to death, he's going to get injured and he's not going to be a very viable NFL prospect.
Let's put a little faith in Beamer & Co. given the fact our offense was pretty high octane the 2nd half of the year.
This attitude was the difference between being 11-1/10-2 and in the playoffs and being 9-3 and out this year.
This attitude was the difference between being 11-1/10-2 and in the playoffs and being 9-3 and out this year.
These takes are terrible. Are you getting ready to delete your account?
Your attitude had us at 4 or max 5 wins. So STFU.
You always resort to calling things a tool when you don't have a competent response.
Your attitude had us at 4 or max 5 wins. So STFU.
I would have hired Kendal Briles as the OC, our offense would have been as the kids say "cookin"
Ugh. That kind of attitude got TCU to 8-4 and 6th place in a shitty, defenseless conference.
I'd hired Andy Reid. Maybe Sean McVay as an analyst. lol
Weird that talent composition suddenly doesn't matter...
Can you point to your prediction for the season?
Yeah, that's what I thought. Kind of odd to try and make fun of someone's prediction when you didn't have the guts to make one yourself.
Granted, after the talk about a division title and "winning out after georgia", it's no surprise you stopped.
If memory serves, @gamecock stock called for 7 or 8 wins, and was called a troll for seeing too many wins this year.
He should probably gloat more about that.
Really is no surprise the two most antagonist posters on this forum are the two who refuse to make any predictions so they can pretend they never get anything wrong.Yeah, that's what I thought. Kind of odd to try and make fun of someone's prediction when you didn't have the guts to make one yourself.
Really is no surprise the two most antagonist posters on this forum are the two who refuse to make any predictions so they can pretend they never get anything wrong.
Weird that talent composition suddenly doesn't matter...
And you've said a lot of things that are on the system. But, who's counting or, wants to take the time to look them up?Ha. Of course you yield to your right brain.
"Gamecock Stock" said a lot of things which I've documented previously.
Also, having 10+ BOT accounts say 10+ different things doesn't make you a visionary.
This attitude was the difference between being 11-1/10-2 and in the playoffs and being 9-3 and out this year.
I would have hired Kendal Briles as the OC, our offense would have been as the kids say "cookin"
Beamer could win 9 games this year and the crybabies on here wouldn't be happy. They would claim it was huge, "missed opportunity" because if we would have had whatever random coach they incorrectly believed we could have hired, we would have won 11 games.
Some people just hate Beamer no matter what. Every fanbase has those idiots. It's an impossible situation for Beamer with those folks. Reminds me of TDS.
Really is no surprise the two most antagonist posters on this forum are the two who refuse to make any predictions so they can pretend they never get anything wrong.
I don't always get things right. But, I did get right that I thought we would have a good and winning season when just about everyone including you doubted that.
I clearly said 6-6 would be a success. 8 wins would be a miracle. 5-7 of course would NOT be a success. Beamer greatly exceeded my expectations.
The difference between me and you howling monkeys is that I'm happy about it and you are crying little bitches because you have a delusional hatred of all things Beamer.
I clearly said 6-6 would be a success. 8 wins would be a miracle. 5-7 of course would NOT be a success. Beamer greatly exceeded my expectations.
The difference between me and you howling monkeys is that I'm happy about it and you are crying little bitches because you have a delusional hatred of all things Beamer.