Mizzou has had more success than us

[caughtlookin]

For the past 5 years everybody has been better than us sans Vandy.

When we joined, we had to deal with really good Vols, Gators and Dawgs teams for well over a decade. Since Missouri joined, only UGA has been the steady good team. A little easier road for sure.

When they start winning in other sports, let’s talk.

 

[Carolina4]

Two divisional football titles over considerably fewer years in the league than us- to our one.

in 2014 we were bad and they won the East. But in 2013 it wasn’t like they beat us to win. Sure they won the East, but we were the better team.

Only the most miserable of fans would be grasping to put us down. Seriously. Where in the hell did thread originate? Only someone looking for something to complain about would come up with this?

 

[Thirdcatgy]

We're both mired in the lower half of mediocrity at the moment (football).

Looking forward to Beamer vs. Drinkwitz. Two young coaches with a good deal of potential.

 

[king ward]

in 2014 we were bad and they won the East. But in 2013 it wasn’t like they beat us to win. Sure they won the East, but we were the better team.

Only the most miserable of fans would be grasping to put us down. Seriously. Where in the hell did thread originate? Only someone looking for something to complain about would come up with this?

This thread is in the greatest traditions of sports boards. It's a filler to occupy people until something important is actually going on. Perhaps the thread was started in order to engage in some casual trolling. In that case, maybe you and some others need to examine yourselves to determine why you are so susceptible.

 

[jeff2001]

We're both mired in the lower half of mediocrity at the moment (football).

Looking forward to Beamer vs. Drinkwitz. Two young coaches with a good deal of potential.

No ,no,no dude you don't understand this is the bitchers daily bitch-fest

 

[CockySC01]

All Gamecock sports matter. But if I had to pick a single sport Carolina was known for winning in- Football would be it. I think 90% of fans would choose the same way.

But yea, if Mizzou is out performing us in anything, especially football, things need improve fast. Unacceptable!

 

[Gamecock Jacque]

You’re not defending anything. You’re pretending we’ve been better than we actually have been.

The first step to fixing a problem is admitting it’s a problem.

So you gonna fix the problem? On a fan board?

 

[Legendary Cock]

Good for them. What is the point of this dynamite drop in? Surely people know the results of the past 10 football seasons

I, too, would like to know the answer to this query.

 

[goosecreekcocky]

Based on what? Our 5-4 head to head record? That’s the only advantage we have on them.

We have a 53% win percentage and zero division titles. They have a 56% win percentage and two division titles.

It’s pretty clear who has been better unfortunately.

I smell a troll.

 

[uscwatson21]

We have been better. You just dont like me defending USC. Not saying we are great or they are great. But since they joined the league the 2 programs have been equal.

But they haven’t. Two division titles versus zero.

That’s not the same.

 

[uscwatson21]

I smell a troll.

Yeah man I've been a Carolina fan for 20 years to just to troll in a thread about missouri.

This type of logic explains why you're missing the point so badly.

 

[Judson1]

Yeah man I've been a Carolina fan for 20 years to just to troll in a thread about missouri.

This type of logic explains why you're missing the point so badly.

Ok man you win. Mizzou is just better. You’ve been harping on it for 12 hours now. I thought you were the OP but he/she started this and only replied once.

 

[alaskagamecock]

It's simple, we have the better team head to head with them since they joined, however they have had more overall conference success as they have more conference titles than we do.

 

[IrishPokerDog]

Missouri is an actual peer. Get back to us if we ever resort to comparing ourselves to Kentucky Football.

Ha!! That’s happened several times on this board - where were you in 2018/2019??

 

[goldengamecock]

Uh, no. We have 3 National Titles since joining. How many does Mizzou have?

No one outside of Mizzou would argue this. Even Mizzou fans wouldn't argue this.

 

[kawalski]

But they haven’t. Two division titles versus zero.

That’s not the same.

Zero? Crap ass fan doesnt even know our History

 

[Gamecock Lifer]

In the SEC...carry on

In one metric- East championships. Beyond that your post is patently false in virtually every other measurable. From record against in FB, accomplishments in virtually all other relevant sports outside of FB, profitability, recognition… We have been vastly superior. They had two good FB teams that mad the CG. That is all they have done to be better than us and neither team won the SEC. Mizzou has proven they belong in the SEC and deserve that credit. Your generalized statement about them in relation to us is irrelevant in incorrect.

 

[uscwatson21]

Zero? Crap ass fan doesnt even know our History

Yep. Says a lot about yourself if you think we’ve won a division since Missouri joined the SEC.

 

[COCKMONSTER]

Missouri has definitely been the better coached team the past few years. Hopefully we’ve fixed that.

 

[kawalski]

Yep. Says a lot about yourself if you think we’ve won a division since Missouri joined the SEC.

Thats Irrelevant, you said we had zero division titles.

 

[01fatboy]

Based on what? Our 5-4 head to head record? That’s the only advantage we have on them.

We have a 53% win percentage and zero division titles. They have a 56% win percentage and two division titles.

It’s pretty clear who has been better unfortunately.

division titles they have 2 we have 1.. where do you get zero? the rest i kinda agree with

 

[uscwatson21]

division titles they have 2 we have 1.. where do you get zero? the rest i kinda agree with

Our only division title was in 2010. They joined in 2012.

So we have zero since they joined.

 

[Six Million Dollar Man]

So they came in and eked out two Eastetn division titles. I would almost say they blindsided everyone because after that they have been totally irrelevant. Who have they beaten?

Plus they don't belong in the SEC. They are a horrible cultural fit.

 

[jerryusc]

So they came in and eked out two Eastetn division titles. I would almost say they blindsided everyone because after that they have been totally irrelevant. Who have they beaten?

Plus they don't belong in the SEC. They are a horrible cultural fit.

They are and always will remain a B10 whore which is where they should be and would be if the B10 was as shortsighted as the SEC as far as that goes. Mo. lapdanced all the presidents in the B10 but still no invite.

 

[DarkHorse2001]

Based on what? Our 5-4 head to head record? That’s the only advantage we have on them.

We have a 53% win percentage and zero division titles. They have a 56% win percentage and two division titles.

It’s pretty clear who has been better unfortunately.

Who has done better between the two schools? South Carolina 5 Missouri 4, head to head games is what matters. If Georgia failed to beat Missouri, and allowed Missouri to win the division, that is not South Carolina's fault.

 

[uscwatson21]

Who has done better between the two schools? South Carolina 5 Missouri 4, head to head games is what matters. If Georgia failed to beat Missouri, and allowed Missouri to win the division, that is not South Carolina's fault.

Yeah it’s South Carolina’s fault for losing to Georgia and Tennessee.