ADVERTISEMENT

OT: Bully reporter

GarnetBeamer

Well-Known Member
Dec 7, 2020
3,787
5,238
113
Naomi Osaka left a press conference in tears after the following exchange with a reporter. It all seems pretty benign to me, unless he was screaming at her or something. A million athletes down the years have been asked by the media about their relationship to the media. Her representative called the reporter a bully and said his behavior was "appalling."

Daugherty: "You're not crazy about dealing with us, especially in this format. Yet you have a lot of outside interests that are served by having a media platform. I guess my question is how do you balance the two? And also do you have anything you'd like to share with us about what you did say to Simone Biles?" (Earlier in the press conference, Osaka said she had sent a message to Biles but said she wanted to give her space, "because I know how overwhelming it can feel.")

Osaka: "When you say I'm not crazy about dealing with you guys, what does that refer to?"


Daugherty: "Well, you've said you don't especially like the press conference format, yet that seems to be obviously the most widely used means of communication to the media and through the media to the public."

Osaka: "That's interesting. I would say the occasion, like when to do the press conferences what I feel is the most difficult. [...] I'm very actually interested in that point of view. So if you could repeat that, that would be awesome."

Daugherty: "The question was that you're not especially fond of dealing with the media, especially in this format. You have suggested there are better ways to do it, that we'd like to try to explore that. My question, I guess, was you also have outside interests beyond tennis that are served by having the platform that the media presents to you. My question is how do you think you might be able to best balance the two?"


Osaka: "I feel like this is something that I can't really speak for everybody. I can only speak for myself, but ever since I was younger I've had a lot of media interest on me, and I think it's because of my background as well as how I play. Because in the first place I'm a tennis player. That's why a lot of people are interested in me.

"I would say in that regard I'm quite different to a lot of people. I can't really help that there are some things that I tweet or some things that I say that kind of create a lot of news articles or things like that. I know it's because I've won a couple grand slams and I've gotten to do a lot of press conferences where these things happen.

"But I would also say I'm not really sure how to balance the two. I'm figuring it out at the same time as you are I would say."
 
I’m not seeing anything even remotely approaching “appalling or bullying” in that exchange.
That was my initial impression when watching the clip on TV (amid noise and distraction in my house). Now, seeing the text of the exchange, yeah, I don't see anything bullying or out of line at all! And I'm no fan of press and press conference reporters who all-too-often are out there to stir the pot and/or try to make a splash or name for themselves. His question(s) was(were) pretty meh/non-controversial.
 
WHAT IS HAPPENING TO SOCIETY.. AND JAPANESE TENNIS??
The Japanese hate her. But it's like every other sport out there now, it's all about politics and no longer about the sport. College football probably has 1 or 2 more seasons before it's as political as the professional organizations and becomes unwatchable too.
 
We are so soft as a country. There is no slippery slope.

Yeah, I've tried to read this exchange from every possible angle, doing my best to imagine what potential insult there could have been. This is about as boring and non-confrontational of an exchange as you can get. The reporter didn't even suggest that Osaka was wrong for not liking dealing with the media but just asked how she balanced her dislike with the ability to use the media to get her message out. I'm digging, but can't find an insult here.

It'll be interesting to see how the media handles this one. They are notoriously defensive of their own, but they are also notoriously defensive of snowflakes.
 
Where are all the apologist posters defending her after the French Open? Maybe they see the pattern now?

In other bullying news have you seen Hope Solo calling Rapinoe a bully about the kneeling issues?

I thought bullies were supposed be bad. Isn’t bullying a national epidemic?
 
The Japanese hate her. But it's like every other sport out there now, it's all about politics and no longer about the sport. College football probably has 1 or 2 more seasons before it's as political as the professional organizations and becomes unwatchable too.
Do you remember the social messages on jerseys last year? I've seen this same declaration countless times about other sports and people still watch.
 
The Japanese hate her. But it's like every other sport out there now, it's all about politics and no longer about the sport. College football probably has 1 or 2 more seasons before it's as political as the professional organizations and becomes unwatchable too.

As much as I don't want to believe it, I think you are correct. We have one, maybe two seasons left of college sports absent the politics.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bflogger28
They are going crazy with spin already.


Saying the reporter was implying that Osaka owed her success to the media...not even CLOSE to what he said!

"And it’s not hard to read his question as, How do you reconcile your reliance on the media with your dislike of the media?" Except...THAT'S NOT WHAT HE SAID!

The reporter is now being described as accusatory and aggressive.
 
It was an election year and there was a pandemic. There were few fans in the stands. It was a combination of a number of things, I imagine.
How does that relate to tv viewings? it should have been sky rocketing if it was still what people wanted to watch. They didn't because of wokness. It's pretty apparent that was the reason.
 
How does that relate to tv viewings? it should have been sky rocketing if it was still what people wanted to watch. They didn't because of wokness. It's pretty apparent that was the reason.
Trying to find one thing to blame for everything doesn't ever work out well.

People were not generally interested in sports last year. There was a lot going on.
 
How does that relate to tv viewings? it should have been sky rocketing if it was still what people wanted to watch. They didn't because of wokness. It's pretty apparent that was the reason.
Answer.... DUH, UMMM, WELL, at home Knitting, gardening, so much more
 
  • Haha
Reactions: TopHook
What were the other reason that no one watched sports while at home with nothing to do?
I haven't surveyed everyone, but I know I wasn't as interested in sports last year. It was boring with no fans, players out, shortened seasons. It all seemed trivial when the country was locked down combined with stupid political stuff. It was down across all sports, college and pro.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TopHook
Hell, I'm a dumbass weekly newspaper editor and I don't like press conferences either. The TV folks tend to hog them up and you can't get in a question without feeling like you're on camera. I get stage fright and I'm not on stage.

I've always preferred 1-on-1 interviews. Less stress for everybody. You get better answers, usually, and it can also produce better questions without some 23-year-old idiot with a microphone trying to monopolize the event.

That said, I think the reporter asked a good question, given the reliance sports has on media. Not sure why that struck a nerve.
 
Not appalling or bullying, but rather stupid and bad journalism.
Not as bad as what CNN did to Bret Farve.

Hey want to come on and talk about your statement that kids under 14 should not play tackle football?

Proceeded to grill him on his vax stance.

BTW he didn’t cry.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bflogger28
Not as bad as what CNN did to Bret Farve.

Hey want to come on and talk about your statement that kids under 14 should not play tackle football?

Proceeded to grill him on his vax stance.

BTW he didn’t cry.
LOL. CNN is a dumpster fire inside an active volcano.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bflogger28
So after going through this thread,
I guess my question(s) is this:
Why is anyone investing any time into this subject ?
Is this just another exercise in a manufactured outrage ?
 
So after going through this thread,
I guess my question(s) is this:
Why is anyone investing any time into this subject ?
Is this just another exercise in a manufactured outrage ?
Depends. Saying the journalist was a bully? Yes manufactured outrage.
 
So after going through this thread,
I guess my question(s) is this:
Why is anyone investing any time into this subject ?
Is this just another exercise in a manufactured outrage ?
People really believe they are not on the other side of the same coin that they spend so much time ridiculing. Everything needs an opinion and needs to be confirmation of some perceived larger problem.

This stuff is eaten up by people because it requires little research or nuance. Ironically, this whole discussion is about the mental fortitude of one of the greatest athletes in the world and richest. I do not understand the how these stories draw so many people like flies to light.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Harvard Gamecock
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT