ADVERTISEMENT

Partial transcript: Tanner discusses SEC response to officiating

The one intriguing thing about that is Ray's question...Do we need another official in the booth?
That is interesting. A ref that can "throw a flag" from there. I think that could be a separate thing from a review.
 
The one intriguing thing about that is Ray's question...Do we need another official in the booth?
That is interesting. A ref that can "throw a flag" from there. I think that could be a separate thing from a review.

Yeah, I brought this up in the other thread yesterday afternoon. I'm personally in favor of not reviewing anything. But with all the aspects of the game they review these days, it doesn't make sense not to include penalties in that. They have the potential to impact the game as much as anything else. If you're going to review things, review it all. Or don't review any of it.

All that said, what did anyone expect to come from the SEC statement? They were obviously not going to come out and say we got screwed.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT