That is not supposed to happen because of the "star power " rule is it? Just goes to show that coaching has about as much to do with winning vs. stars. I know you don't want your team filled with 1 and 2 stars but you don't have to have all 4 and 5 stars to win but it makes you have a better chance of a win. We should be ok in 1 or 2 more years if we keep getting top 20 or even top 25 talent.
Key for recipe: Talent+coaching
Low talent+poor coaching: Poor team (Wake Forest)
Low talent+average coaching: Poor team (Vanderbuilt)
Low talent+great coaching: Good team (Duke)
Average talent+poor coaching: Poor team (FSU)
Average talent+ average coaching: average team (S. Car)
Average talent+great coaching: Good team (Kentucky)
Great talent+poor coaching: Average team (Auburn)
Great talent+average coaching: Great team (LSU)
Great talent+great coaching: Alabama
I'd say right now we're sitting at average talent with average coaching, so were an average team, with aspirations to make a bowl game. This coaching staff with great talent may turn some heads, upset some people but won't make it undefeated or make it past the Superior talent/coaching teams. May need some help with DL, LB, RB, coaching positions to make this team great. Althought we seriously lack DL size/depth and secondary experience/depth.