Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The south campus plan calls for Carolina Gardens to be torn down and replaced, along with Bates, Bates West, and Cliff. The 1,200 beds in the four facilities will be replaced with 4,000 in a massive south campus village.I like the way they have 'opened up' the southwest corner of the facility (directly across form the Athletic Village). This will 'connect' the two areas very nicely, imo.
Since the university has future plans to demolish the old 'Carolina Gardens' (formerly the Wales Garden) apartments, do you (Beckham or anyone else) know if that block will be transferred to the Athletic Department? The new South Campus Housing Plan indicated some different use of that area, but I don't think they specified housing, academic or service use.
Btw, the South Campus Housing Plan is on 'go' per the last BOT meeting. There appears, however, to be a concern from some nearby residents about students 'walking through' their neighborhoods. Hmmmm . . . . shades of the 1950's?
Rather spend resources on 5 star football recruits.
Where was Carolina Gardens? Was that across the streets from Bates and Bates West?I like the way they have 'opened up' the southwest corner of the facility (directly across form the Athletic Village). This will 'connect' the two areas very nicely, imo.
Since the university has future plans to demolish the old 'Carolina Gardens' (formerly the Wales Garden) apartments, do you (Beckham or anyone else) know if that block will be transferred to the Athletic Department? The new South Campus Housing Plan indicated some different use of that area, but I don't think they specified housing, academic or service use.
Btw, the South Campus Housing Plan is on 'go' per the last BOT meeting. There appears, however, to be a concern from some nearby residents about students 'walking through' their neighborhoods. Hmmmm . . . . shades of the 1950's?
It's on the block immediately east of the old indoor facility.Where was Carolina Gardens? Was that across the streets from Bates and Bates West?
The school or private?The south campus plan calls for Carolina Gardens to be torn down and replaced, along with Bates, Bates West, and Cliff. The 1,200 beds in the four facilities will be replaced with 4,000 in a massive south campus village.
School wants to work with a developer unless something has changed. I haven't read anything different on it.The school or private?
School wants to work with a developer unless something has changed. I haven't read anything different on it.
http://www.thestate.com/news/local/education/article37232841.html
The two dorms/retail fronts on Lincoln are partnerships between the University and a developer.
Not sure, but those projects were wrongly given tax incentives. Those were all 100% private. The private developments of late include Greene Crossing, The Station at Five Points, Park Place, and Pulaski Square. I don't know which ones were given the incentives, but the city definitely messed up. What else is new?Do you know how many developers have submitted proposals and what the closing date is to submit a proposal?
I've read stories that several lawsuits were filed this summer intended to reverse tax-abatements granted several other student-residential projects located within the Columbia city-limits amounting to millions of dollars over the 10-year abatement period granted prior to construction.
If successful those suits would have a material impact on any bid for this project and play real havoc with the financing supplied for those other four or five projects already funded and built, all of which relied on the agreements they signed with the City.
It seems bizarre to me that a government entity (city, county or state) could/would enter into ANY 'agreement' subsequently relied on by a developer and his lenders that might be ruled 'invalid' by a Judge. If THAT does happen you might see a WHOLE LOT of nothing happening for a while 'cause banks have recourse against their borrowers, while the investors who bought their 'bundled' securities have recourse against THEM if.when promised 'fixed' yields take a tumble ... they don't take kindly being lied to (or 'misled' - intentional or not) by the political entity granting the permits to build.
This.Long term, We need to acquire the fairgrounds. Period. End of statement.