section2cock Well-Known Member Feb 7, 1999 9,396 10,146 113 Feb 8, 2015 #2 So based on that study, we essentially play at the level of our recruiting
ken in sacramento Well-Known Member Jan 16, 2000 9,566 2,406 113 Feb 8, 2015 #3 the data omits 2014, which I believe would tend to pull us down
cockn'fyr Well-Known Member Mar 26, 2006 9,529 1,631 113 Feb 8, 2015 #4 Originally posted by ken in sacramento: the data omits 2014, which I believe would tend to pull us down Click to expand... I guess I just got a little giddy seeing only 7 teams in that upper right square (7 pretty good programs) and us being one of them!
Originally posted by ken in sacramento: the data omits 2014, which I believe would tend to pull us down Click to expand... I guess I just got a little giddy seeing only 7 teams in that upper right square (7 pretty good programs) and us being one of them!
cockn'fyr Well-Known Member Mar 26, 2006 9,529 1,631 113 Feb 8, 2015 #5 Originally posted by ken in sacramento: the data omits 2014, which I believe would tend to pull us down Click to expand... I guess I just got a little giddy seeing only 7 teams in that upper right square (7 pretty good programs) and us being one of them!
Originally posted by ken in sacramento: the data omits 2014, which I believe would tend to pull us down Click to expand... I guess I just got a little giddy seeing only 7 teams in that upper right square (7 pretty good programs) and us being one of them!
G Gamecawks Well-Known Member Sep 17, 2012 3,157 86 48 Feb 8, 2015 #6 It's impressive we do as well as we do with our middle-of-the-road recruiting, which is a testament to Spurrier and co. honestly. But yeah, if we want to take that next step, we're going to have to hit the elite level in recruiting.
It's impressive we do as well as we do with our middle-of-the-road recruiting, which is a testament to Spurrier and co. honestly. But yeah, if we want to take that next step, we're going to have to hit the elite level in recruiting.
