Do you guys actually think satterfield lost the game last night?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b119/8b1198e5c4e698647171dd51f026848275e86cfc" alt="giphy.gif"
Do you guys actually think satterfield lost the game last night?
Get the guy who replaced Mike Sanford. Western Kentucky has the NUMBER THREE (3) offense in the country .A guy that was with Clayton white - Mike Sanford at Western Kentucky who is now OC at Minnesota.
No, he lost the game before the season even started when he decided to implement an offensive scheme that is not suited to the skill sets/talents of the players on our current roster.Do you guys actually think satterfield lost the game last night?
If we had any semblance of an offense that's an entirely different game.Do you guys actually think satterfield lost the game last night?
Yep. "We really NEED to win our bowl game". IF we don't, then there will be no boost to our recruiting.Who do you think we can get? Known names aren't coming to the rescue. We really NEED to win our bowl game.
I’m reminded of the scene in 40 year old virgin where his friends are advising him to run through a bunch of hood rats before he makes a move on the woman he likes. Satterfield is another hood rat and we need to “hit it and quit it”. This would be like me bringing a woman with no teeth and a fourth grade education home for thanksgiving and saying “mom aren’t you proud of me?”How many years and OCs has our offensive looked like crap?
I like the day trading analogy. You don't hold onto a loss in the hopes of it suddenly becoming a winner. It may happen every once in a while but if you make a habit of holding your losers eventually you're going to blow up your account. You have to cut them while the losses are manageable and move onto another trade.How many years and OCs has our offensive looked like crap?
I’m reminded of the scene in 40 year old virgin where his friends are advising him to run through a bunch of hood rats before he makes a move on the woman he likes. Satterfield is another hood rat and we need to “hit it and quit it”. This would be like me bringing a woman with no teeth and a fourth grade education home for thanksgiving and saying “mom aren’t you proud of me?”
You mean you don't aspire to the continuity of poor play calling and losing?Seriously, go look at the recruiting. It's not just us who see Satterfield is a train wreck. We got no players coming in who can help. The "continuity" he provides isn't the type of continuity you want.
I understand this to a point but how can mediocre ACC teams like BC, ga tech, Louisville,Syracuse perform so much better? Granted they lost but not embarrassed and easily could have wonName one offensive coach that would have made a difference last night....one team has a elite defense and on has a bad o line.....that equates to 30-0....
Yes, or to continue with my analogy, it would be like this girl getting pregnant from your best friend and you find hope by saying “maybe the next one will be mine”I like the day trading analogy. You don't hold onto a loss in the hopes of it suddenly becoming a winner. It may happen every once in a while but if you make a habit of holding your losers eventually you're going to blow up your account. You have to cut them while the losses are manageable and move onto another trade.
We are NEVER going to get the recruits we need in order to win big until we have coaches on the staff who can get the players, on hand, to overachieve. Does anyone really believe that Marcus Satterfield and Greg Adkins have the coaching chops to get their players to overachieve? Steve Spurrier did. He had proved it and his name and reputation attracted great players to USC. That's why he produced 3 national Top 10 teams here, including number 4 in the nation. I like Shane Beamer. But, he does not have the Spurrier reputation nor coaching ability to attract a significant number of high caliber recruits. He needs help from a strong band of assistants. Satterfield and Adkins are not that.Seriously, go look at the recruiting. It's not just us who see Satterfield is a train wreck. We got no players coming in who can help. The "continuity" he provides isn't the type of continuity you want.
I could be all wrong BUT, I believe that Beamer KNOWS what he has to do. I know it will be unpleasant for him. BUT, he does claim that South Carolina is his "dream job". Thus, I expect him to respond and act accordingly.
Well said!We are NEVER going to get the recruits we need in order to win big until we have coaches on the staff who can get the players, on hand, to overachieve. Does anyone really believe that Marcus Satterfield and Greg Adkins have the coaching chops to get their players to overachieve? Steve Spurrier did. He had proved it and his name and reputation attracted great players to USC. That's why he produced 3 national Top 10 teams here, including number 4 in the nation. I like Shane Beamer. But, he does not have the Spurrier reputation nor coaching ability to attract a significant number of high caliber recruits. He needs help from a strong band of assistants. Satterfield and Adkins are not that.
Maybe you should hit the transfer portal. Fans like you aren’t needed.I say fire Ray and the bot first- this season was completely unacceptable, especially the last game was an embarrassment. Beamer and his coaches walked into the mess. Heads should roll. But they won’t.