Well crap. Not gonna spoil my happiness though, We dominated their azzes tonight.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, much less venom being spewed tonight.10 pages on this thread. Yep! It’s a win for the Cocks.
If we were losing it would be 24 pages.
Why can’t we see Urich ?
Two backs over 100 yds tonight! Feaster with 107 and Dowdle with 102. Don't see that often enough around here.
Great win.
He’s a wide receiver, no point in playing him at this point, if anything Glick goes in.Why can’t we see Urich ?
85 yards in 2 minutes. If they played that kid they would have won. We cannot stop a running QB. Not ever!
Rico - but the camera showed him walking around (albeit gingerly) and smiling near the end of the game.I just got back. Who's injured?
His "in game" adjustments may not have been as stellar as some of us thought.Stoops should have brought this guy in at halftime.
He’s a wide receiver, no point in playing him at this point, if anything Glick goes in.
Agree.Great win.
Great post.Not sure if y’all realized it but the 22 and 27 Feaster had on his eye black stickers were for two former teammates that passed within the last year, Fuller and Dye. I hate that Feaster isn’t on our team but he’s a good young man. Glad he had a nice night and was able to show what he can do.
Good luck with “Open” next week, I heard Muschamp really wants to kick their arse.
I'm negative as can be but I thought we played as well as I couldve hoped after that lackluster display in Mo. I have no idea why this thread was so negative. We took it to them in the trenches which was very surprising. Much more aggressive on defense. Honestly, the best we've looked all year.Agree.
But reading this thread after the game was like listening to a back-handed compliment. Never have seen so many excuses being made for why our team was playing well. Some were really creative in finding ways to criticize and diminish our team and coaches for good play on the field.
Who is Glick?
I'm negative as can be but I thought we played as well as I couldve hoped after that lackluster display in Mo. I have no idea why this thread was so negative. We took it to them in the trenches which was very surprising. Much more aggressive on defense. Honestly, the best we've looked all year.
Hello darkness my old friend.85 yards in 2 minutes. If they played that kid they would have won. We cannot stop a running QB. Not ever!
Stoops should have brought this guy in at halftime.
85 yards in 2 minutes. If they played that kid they would have won. We cannot stop a running QB. Not ever!
Back up QB, turned down lacrosse scholarships to walk on here. Played at HammondWho is Glick?
They had a better chance with him running the ball and maybe dropping a pass in here and there than they were ever going to have with the other guy, who was completely inept. JMO.He's their only receiving threat.
I don't think he had many tools in his box, Brother.His "in game" adjustments may not have been as stellar as some of us thought.