Things are about to get a lot tougher on single dudes
- Thread starter GarnetBeamer
- Start date
USCBatgirl21
Well-Known Member
That's because outside of a few exceptions, women weren't considered people, but property.
Some people thrive on social justice warrior butt hurt. I believe their bodies convert it to vitamin c.
Where is the social justice aspect to this? This is more akin to a fashion/style thread.
there’s like one in a hundred women who can grow a stashe. those are also the ones that don’t shave them anyway. what’s the big deal?
TheReeEss
"You are not to cut the hair at the sides of your head or mar your beard" (CSB) That verse doesn't mention women.
Women don't have the facial hair to which the verse applies.
Indeed, in the world of that era, women were for the most part were considered chattel. Judaism did better than most at protecting womens' rights. That, of course, is relative.
"You are not to cut the hair at the sides of your head or mar your beard" (CSB) That verse doesn't mention women.
Women don't have the facial hair to which the verse applies.
Indeed, in the world of that era, women were for the most part were considered chattel. Judaism did better than most at protecting womens' rights. That, of course, is relative.
Women's hair removal until 1915 was unheard of....and was totally an American trend. The reason for it was Gillette was wanting to find a new market for it's new safety razors. It didn't really take off until the 1930s. Look at a lot of the flapper era pictures from the 1920's. It was completely unheard of in Europe, Asia, and other parts of the world. It was a marketing ploy that gained popularity because of the new dress styles that allowed women to show more skin.
Well, on the one hand, you've got chicks wanting to grow facial hair. On the other you've got dudes with facial hair sporting ladies makeup.
You would be amazed the amount of things we normalize because businesses wanted to make a quick buck, like the pledge of allegiance was just a ploy to sell a ton of flags
absolutely not young man! finish your games and come eat this macncheese your father and i slaved over for three minutes in the microwave.(bought with our government money we actually paid for with our past taxes, we assume, so therefore it’s owed.) then you can use your iphone while we watch our favorite half porn adult themed hbo show right in front you! don’t go apeshit at bed time pleeeease?
The other poster was essentially saying because we are males we can’t comment nor care about a woman’s appearance.
You can say whatever you want, but there is a right way and a wrong way to go about it, and that has never changed from the 70's-90's, and this has nothing to do with being PC.
It's human nature to like complaints. Just frame it right.
Wow ,I knew I would look at this thread and king "woke" would be on here. We get it dude you're woke.
USCBatgirl21
Well-Known Member
However, there are some times that we just like to have fun with threads, and not deal with the buzz kill.
Then next thing you know we will be back in the bushes.
Woke? That story has been known for years as is the fact that Francis Bellamy, the one who penned it, was a socialist. This is nothing new....at all.
Is hibernation the alternative to "woke"?
He simply posted a story that emphasized the commercialism that exists in America and how it ingrains itself into the public psyche and traditions. Same thing that a lot of people complain about around Christmas.
I took a rafting trip down the Chatooga one year. Our boat guide was a proud Alabama grad. She had hairy pits and legs. She kept her skoal in her bathing suit top. Even offered us a dip. I fell up against her legs in Bull Sluice and it was like brushing up against a cactus. That cured me from hairy legged, hairy pit women forever. That and the dip leaking out of her lips. But she had that Bama degree
Similar threads
