ADVERTISEMENT

Well, our Poor

Today is a very nice ending to Bidenomics. Rupert Murdock's MarketWatch indicated, "the January jobs report shows the U.S labor market is as good as it gets, with wages growing more than expected, which effectively closes the book on the Biden-era job market."

It's now all on Trump to keep it going. I'm sincerely pulling for Trump to keep it going. You'd have to be a fool not to.

Stock - I have to admire how you can write a series of infomercials about our debt and laude the effort the biggest money printer President in the history of the country who also did nothing but post fake economic data for 4 years. :)
 
Today is a very nice ending to Bidenomics. Rupert Murdock's MarketWatch indicated, "the January jobs report shows the U.S labor market is as good as it gets, with wages growing more than expected, which effectively closes the book on the Biden-era job market."

It's now all on Trump to keep it going. I'm sincerely pulling for Trump to keep it going. You'd have to be a fool not to.

Aren't there now issues with those job numbers? There was the very large reduction (800k jobs) in the estimates at one point, and now the group that puts out those numbers is fighting against allowing DOGE access.

It's speculation at this point, but I wouldn't be surprised to see the job numbers from the last few years come under heavy scrutiny soon, and start to be revised again.
 
Every. Single. Time.

Right on cue. Here ya go Stock. Your media sources never bother to report on the revisions, so I thought I might share. :)

 
This.

We've never needed to pay taxes if our country was managed even at 75% efficiency with the vast resources we have available.

 
Stock - I have to admire how you can write a series of infomercials about our debt and laude the effort the biggest money printer President in the history of the country who also did nothing but post fake economic data for 4 years. :)
Ward, as you know, Trump ran up our debt greatly. And I'm quoting Rupert Murdoch's outfit regarding the labor market.
 
Ward, as you know, Trump ran up our debt greatly. And I'm quoting Rupert Murdoch's outfit regarding the labor market.

We've tried to discuss this in-depth and you always seem to "have to run" when the conversation gets beyond sound bites.

You're a very busy guy though. I get it. :)
 
Aren't there now issues with those job numbers? There was the very large reduction (800k jobs) in the estimates at one point, and now the group that puts out those numbers is fighting against allowing DOGE access.

It's speculation at this point, but I wouldn't be surprised to see the job numbers from the last few years come under heavy scrutiny soon, and start to be revised again.
According to Rupert Murdoch's outfit, the job numbers for November and December were revised upward. The numbers are always revised including during the Trump era. It appears though that the Murdoch outfit is impressed. Yes, there are those fighting Musk when they believe he is violating the law.. It would be in Trump's interest to have those numbers revised downward.
 
She is one of the worst in a sea of the worst.

The Democratic Party can't seem to find one intelligent voice in any of it.

Schumer is a fool. Warren is a fool. AOC is a fool. Schiff is a fool and a tool.

It's mind boggling.

 
According to Rupert Murdoch's outfit, the job numbers for November and December were revised upward. The numbers are always revised including during the Trump era. It appears though that the Murdoch outfit is impressed. Yes, there are those fighting Musk when they believe he is violating the law.. It would be in Trump's interest to have those numbers revised downw

Oh my.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gamecock stock
It's actually $34 Million to date for Politico. But what's another $26 Million among friends?

I have no doubt you can't provide any legitimate sourcing for the claim the federal government spent $34 million on politico in 2024.
 
According to Rupert Murdoch's outfit, the job numbers for November and December were revised upward. The numbers are always revised including during the Trump era. It appears though that the Murdoch outfit is impressed. Yes, there are those fighting Musk when they believe he is violating the law.. It would be in Trump's interest to have those numbers revised downward.

It's honestly sad people fall for misinformation about a routine process that's happened for their entire life.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gamecock stock
Ha. I know you speak only the truth.

The fact that Biden's figures were marked down for 4 years straight should bear no ties to the current. :)
Revisions to the job market have been going on for decades under both Republican and Democratic administrations. I'm just quoting Rupert Murdoch's boys regarding the economy gifted to Trump. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: uscwatson21
Why are dumb people so fixated on called others Hitler, Nazi, Fascist, etc?

I guess I just answered my own question. :)

You can always put on a false bravado internet tough guy act, but we both know it burns you deep inside knowing that your opponents are smarter than you.
 
Revisions to the job market have been going on for decades under both Republican and Democratic administrations. I'm just quoting Rupert Murdoch's boys regarding the economy gifted to Trump. :)

You might want to compare the both the number and totality of the revisions among each leader and check back with us.
 
You might want to compare the both the number and totality of the revisions among each leader and check back with us.
They have been going on for decades, PERIOD. And again, it's Rupert Murdoch's boys who printed that Trump is being gifted a VERY nice economy, which in essence, is the bottom-line.
 
Yet you're not going to freak out about the 1.9 trillion dollars the trump tax cuts will add to the federal debt...
No, because I am already reaping the tax savings from his first administration, which are due to expire unless Congress votes this year to keep them. I can’t wait until Tuberville’s bill to eliminate tax on Social Security benefits becomes law. I pity the Democrats who vote “NO” to eliminating tax on SS benefits. Their political future will be over if they do.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT