The unvaccinated still have to deal with some undesired consequences (shedding) from the vaccinated. Thanks again, Fauci.
----------
Peters et al. found that women with daily close proximity (within 6 feet) to vaccinated individuals outside their household had:
- 34% higher risk of heavier bleeding.
- 28% higher risk of menstruation starting over 7 days early.
- 26% higher risk of bleeding lasting more than 7 days. The authors concluded,
“Our findings suggest possible indirect transmission of ingredients or products of the COVID-19 vaccines, presumably through shedding, from people who received one or more of the COVID-19 injections.”
https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/113
This is laughable. The dumbest "online survey" possible. Even dumber is the person who posts it.
"Peters" did
not find that women with daily close proximity to vaccinated individuals" - There was no way to tell if only women even filled out this "online survey"
The "editor in chief" of this joke of a publication is a former linguistics professor.
1) An
online survey conducted by an anti-vaccine group
2) No verification made as to who filled out the survey. The reader has to take their word for it. That's not proper for actual research.
3) The average age of the people (they say women but we have no proof of that) that filled out the survey is 37.8. It's well known that women in their late 30's experience more instances of irregular periods. Numerous actual research articles explain this in-depth and can be easily read online.
3) The survey itself says they took the word of the people that choose to fill out the survey. There was no verification, no medical documentation- just the word of people who filled out an online survey sponsored by an anti-vaccine group.
4) The people filling out the survey were supposedly "indirectly exposed" to people who
they believe took the COVID vaccine (but had no proof).
5) "Indirect exposure" is defined as "within 6 feet" of a vaccinated person but this is a random distance and there is no explanation as to how the individual would know someone else actually had taken a vaccine.
This is akin to a survey filled out by Clemson fans about how much they like Clemson and the survey admitting that "Clemson fans served as their own control group"
This is not remotely scientific in any sense of the word.
Only a world class idiot would think this is legitimate or even post it as if it was- and yes- the kind of idiot you call an idiot right to their stupid face in person.
God, you are the dumbest person on this site and that's a real accomplishment.